H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Pete Sampras vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 7-0

Pete Sampras holds a 7–0 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Pete Sampras leads 4–0 on carpet and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 1997 Wimbledon final 6-4 6-2 6-4.

USA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
7 0
7 main draw meetings
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 7, 1997* Wimbledon Grand Slam F Grass Pete Sampras #1 6-4 6-2 6-4 Cedric Pioline #23 Match data
Jul 3, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Pete Sampras #1 6-4 6-4 6-2 Cedric Pioline #16 Match data
Nov 13, 1993* Antwerp ATP 250 SF Carpet Pete Sampras #1 4-6 7-5 6-1 Cedric Pioline #11 Match data
Oct 24, 1993* Lyon ATP 250 F Carpet Pete Sampras #1 7-6(5) 1-6 7-5 Cedric Pioline #10 Match data
Sep 13, 1993* US Open Grand Slam F Hard Pete Sampras #1 6-4 6-4 6-3 Cedric Pioline #11 Match data
Oct 25, 1992* Lyon ATP 250 F Carpet Pete Sampras #3 6-4 6-2 Cedric Pioline #46 Match data
Nov 8, 1990* Wembley ATP 250 R32 Carpet Pete Sampras #5 6-2 4-6 6-3 Cedric Pioline #126 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pete Sampras #34 #1 5,792 2,265 737 208 78.0% 14 11 7 0 32 64
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pete Sampras Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 10–10 50.0% #97 1,605 0 0
17 1989 18–19 48.6% #81 1,699 0 0
18 1990 51–19 72.9% #5 2,047 1 4
19 1991 52–17 75.4% #6 2,091 1 8
20 1992 66–15 81.5% #3 2,118 1 13 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1993 82–15 84.5% #1 2,126 3 21 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1994 74–9 89.2% #1 2,196 5 31 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1995 66–17 79.5% #1 2,134 7 36 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1996 66–10 86.8% #1 2,183 8 44 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1997 55–10 84.6% #1 2,187 10 52 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1998 61–18 77.2% #1 2,042 11 56 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1999 38–9 80.9% #3 2,117 12 61 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 2000 40–11 78.4% #3 2,068 13 63 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 2001 33–15 68.8% #10 2,003 13 63 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2002 25–14 64.1% #13 1,977 14 64 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5