H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Pete Sampras vs Chris Woodruff H2H: 4-1

Pete Sampras holds a 4–1 lead over Chris Woodruff in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Pete Sampras leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 2001 Los Angeles third round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pete Sampras
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Chris Woodruff
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 26, 2001* Los Angeles ATP 250 R32 Hard Pete Sampras #12 7-5 6-2 Chris Woodruff #93 Match data
Feb 22, 2001* Memphis ATP 250 R32 Hard Chris Woodruff #96 7-6(4) 6-2 Pete Sampras #3 Match data
May 17, 2000* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Pete Sampras #2 6-4 7-6(5) Chris Woodruff #36 Match data
Jan 28, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Pete Sampras #3 7-5 6-3 6-3 Chris Woodruff #56 Match data
Feb 15, 1997* San Jose ATP 250 QF Hard Pete Sampras #1 6-2 6-3 Chris Woodruff #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pete Sampras #34 #1 5,792 2,265 737 208 78.0% 14 11 7 0 32 64
Chris Woodruff #1,334 #29 1,273 1,829 108 106 50.5% 0 1 0 0 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pete Sampras Chris Woodruff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 10–10 50.0% #97 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1989 18–19 48.6% #81 1,699 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1990 51–19 72.9% #5 2,047 1 4 — — — — — — —
19 1991 52–17 75.4% #6 2,091 1 8 — — — — — — —
20 1992 66–15 81.5% #3 2,118 1 13 1993 1–2 33.3% #337 1,496 0 0
21 1993 82–15 84.5% #1 2,126 3 21 1994 0–2 0.0% #300 1,480 0 0
22 1994 74–9 89.2% #1 2,196 5 31 1995 1–2 33.3% #135 1,485 0 0
23 1995 66–17 79.5% #1 2,134 7 36 1996 20–18 52.6% #43 1,667 0 0
24 1996 66–10 86.8% #1 2,183 8 44 1997 35–21 62.5% #30 1,777 0 1
25 1997 55–10 84.6% #1 2,187 10 52 1998 0–1 0.0% #1324 1,761 0 1
26 1998 61–18 77.2% #1 2,042 11 56 1999 22–19 53.7% #51 1,770 0 2
27 1999 38–9 80.9% #3 2,117 12 61 2000 18–23 43.9% #67 1,687 0 2
28 2000 40–11 78.4% #3 2,068 13 63 2001 11–17 39.3% #118 1,630 0 2
29 2001 33–15 68.8% #10 2,003 13 63 2002 0–1 0.0% #496 1,589 0 2
30 2002 25–14 64.1% #13 1,977 14 64 — — — — — — —