H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Pete Sampras vs Guillaume Raoux H2H: 3-1

Pete Sampras holds a 3–1 lead over Guillaume Raoux in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Pete Sampras leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Guillaume Raoux leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 1999 Indianapolis third round 6-4 7-5.

USA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 16, 1999 Indianapolis ATP 250 R32 Hard Pete Sampras #1 6-4 7-5 Guillaume Raoux #82 Match data
Apr 2, 1994* Osaka ATP 250 QF Hard Pete Sampras #1 6-3 6-3 Guillaume Raoux #90 Match data
Apr 9, 1993* Tokyo Outdoor ATP 250 R16 Hard Pete Sampras #2 6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 Guillaume Raoux #54 Match data
Nov 3, 1990* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Guillaume Raoux #134 6-3 3-6 6-3 Pete Sampras #5 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pete Sampras #34 #1 5,792 2,265 737 208 78.0% 14 11 7 0 32 64
Guillaume Raoux #1,033 #35 1,041 1,806 175 222 44.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pete Sampras Guillaume Raoux
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 10–10 50.0% #97 1,605 0 0
17 1989 18–19 48.6% #81 1,699 0 0
18 1990 51–19 72.9% #5 2,047 1 4 1988 0–1 0.0% #448 1,492 0 0
19 1991 52–17 75.4% #6 2,091 1 8 1989 1–6 14.3% #220 1,462 0 0
20 1992 66–15 81.5% #3 2,118 1 13 1990 6–9 40.0% #84 1,529 0 0
21 1993 82–15 84.5% #1 2,126 3 21 1991 14–25 35.9% #104 1,615 0 0
22 1994 74–9 89.2% #1 2,196 5 31 1992 14–16 46.7% #93 1,619 0 1
23 1995 66–17 79.5% #1 2,134 7 36 1993 27–28 49.1% #85 1,627 0 1
24 1996 66–10 86.8% #1 2,183 8 44 1994 15–20 42.9% #115 1,572 0 1
25 1997 55–10 84.6% #1 2,187 10 52 1995 17–22 43.6% #77 1,566 0 1
26 1998 61–18 77.2% #1 2,042 11 56 1996 21–21 50.0% #72 1,630 0 1
27 1999 38–9 80.9% #3 2,117 12 61 1997 26–26 50.0% #47 1,728 0 1
28 2000 40–11 78.4% #3 2,068 13 63 1998 24–27 47.1% #53 1,735 0 1
29 2001 33–15 68.8% #10 2,003 13 63 1999 10–19 34.5% #137 1,577 0 1
30 2002 25–14 64.1% #13 1,977 14 64 2000 0–2 0.0% #668 1,553 0 1