H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Pete Sampras vs Guillaume Raoux H2H: 3-1
Pete Sampras holds a 3–1 lead over Guillaume Raoux in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Pete Sampras leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Guillaume Raoux leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 1999 Indianapolis third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1999 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Pete Sampras | 6-4 7-5 | Guillaume Raoux | Match data |
| Apr 2, 1994* | Osaka | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Pete Sampras | 6-3 6-3 | Guillaume Raoux | Match data |
| Apr 9, 1993* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Pete Sampras | 6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 | Guillaume Raoux | Match data |
| Nov 3, 1990* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Guillaume Raoux | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Pete Sampras | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | #34 | #1 | 5,792 | 2,265 | 737 | 208 | 78.0% | 14 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 32 | 64 |
| Guillaume Raoux | #1,033 | #35 | 1,041 | 1,806 | 175 | 222 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pete Sampras | Guillaume Raoux | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #81 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 52–17 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,091 | 1 | 8 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #3 | 2,118 | 1 | 13 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 82–15 | 84.5% | #1 | 2,126 | 3 | 21 | 1991 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #104 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 74–9 | 89.2% | #1 | 2,196 | 5 | 31 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #93 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1995 | 66–17 | 79.5% | #1 | 2,134 | 7 | 36 | 1993 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #85 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 66–10 | 86.8% | #1 | 2,183 | 8 | 44 | 1994 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #1 | 2,187 | 10 | 52 | 1995 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 61–18 | 77.2% | #1 | 2,042 | 11 | 56 | 1996 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1999 | 38–9 | 80.9% | #3 | 2,117 | 12 | 61 | 1997 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2000 | 40–11 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,068 | 13 | 63 | 1998 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #53 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2001 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #10 | 2,003 | 13 | 63 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #137 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2002 | 25–14 | 64.1% | #13 | 1,977 | 14 | 64 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |