H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Pete Sampras vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 2-0
Pete Sampras holds a 2–0 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pete Sampras leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 2002 Canada Masters third round 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2002* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Pete Sampras | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
| Sep 6, 2000* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Pete Sampras | 7-6(4) 6-2 6-4 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | #34 | #1 | 5,792 | 2,265 | 737 | 208 | 78.0% | 14 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 32 | 64 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Pete Sampras | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #81 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 52–17 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,091 | 1 | 8 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #3 | 2,118 | 1 | 13 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 82–15 | 84.5% | #1 | 2,126 | 3 | 21 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 74–9 | 89.2% | #1 | 2,196 | 5 | 31 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 66–17 | 79.5% | #1 | 2,134 | 7 | 36 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 66–10 | 86.8% | #1 | 2,183 | 8 | 44 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #1 | 2,187 | 10 | 52 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 61–18 | 77.2% | #1 | 2,042 | 11 | 56 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 38–9 | 80.9% | #3 | 2,117 | 12 | 61 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 40–11 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,068 | 13 | 63 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #10 | 2,003 | 13 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 25–14 | 64.1% | #13 | 1,977 | 14 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |