H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Pete Sampras vs Jakob Hlasek H2H: 6-1

Pete Sampras holds a 6–1 lead over Jakob Hlasek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Pete Sampras leads 3–1 on hard courts and 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 1996 Cincinnati Masters third round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pete Sampras
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 8, 1996* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Pete Sampras #1 6-3 6-4 Jakob Hlasek #54 Match data
Mar 21, 1996* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Pete Sampras #2 7-5 7-6(3) Jakob Hlasek #42 Match data
Mar 8, 1996* Rotterdam ATP 250 R16 Carpet Pete Sampras #1 6-7(6) 6-4 6-4 Jakob Hlasek #43 Match data
Nov 5, 1995* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Carpet Pete Sampras #2 6-2 6-3 Jakob Hlasek #52 Match data
Oct 23, 1993* Lyon ATP 250 SF Carpet Pete Sampras #1 1-6 6-3 7-6(6) Jakob Hlasek #46 Match data
Mar 7, 1992* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Jakob Hlasek #24 6-4 3-6 7-5 Pete Sampras #4 Match data
Sep 2, 1990* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Pete Sampras #12 6-3 6-4 6-1 Jakob Hlasek #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pete Sampras #34 #1 5,792 2,265 737 208 78.0% 14 11 7 0 32 64
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 389 300 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pete Sampras Jakob Hlasek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 10–10 50.0% #97 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1989 18–19 48.6% #81 1,699 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0
18 1990 51–19 72.9% #5 2,047 1 4 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0
19 1991 52–17 75.4% #6 2,091 1 8 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0
20 1992 66–15 81.5% #3 2,118 1 13 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,784 0 0
21 1993 82–15 84.5% #1 2,126 3 21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0
22 1994 74–9 89.2% #1 2,196 5 31 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,856 0 0
23 1995 66–17 79.5% #1 2,134 7 36 1988 44–14 75.9% #8 2,050 0 2
24 1996 66–10 86.8% #1 2,183 8 44 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3
25 1997 55–10 84.6% #1 2,187 10 52 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,937 0 4
26 1998 61–18 77.2% #1 2,042 11 56 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,869 0 5
27 1999 38–9 80.9% #3 2,117 12 61 1992 24–22 52.2% #36 1,806 0 5
28 2000 40–11 78.4% #3 2,068 13 63 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5
29 2001 33–15 68.8% #10 2,003 13 63 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,676 0 5
30 2002 25–14 64.1% #13 1,977 14 64 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,751 0 5