H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Pete Sampras vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 4-0

Pete Sampras holds a 4–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Pete Sampras leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 1998 Vienna fourth round 5-7 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pete Sampras
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 16, 1998* Vienna ATP 250 R16 Carpet Pete Sampras #1 5-7 6-1 6-3 Jeff Tarango #72 Match data
Apr 1, 1994* Osaka ATP 250 R16 Hard Pete Sampras #1 7-6(2) 7-6(4) Jeff Tarango #104 Match data
Mar 15, 1993* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Pete Sampras #2 7-6(4) 6-3 Jeff Tarango #71 Match data
Oct 22, 1992* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Pete Sampras #3 7-6(5) 6-3 Jeff Tarango #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pete Sampras #34 #1 5,792 2,265 737 208 78.0% 14 11 7 0 32 64
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pete Sampras Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 10–10 50.0% #97 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1989 18–19 48.6% #81 1,699 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1990 51–19 72.9% #5 2,047 1 4 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1991 52–17 75.4% #6 2,091 1 8 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1992 66–15 81.5% #3 2,118 1 13 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1993 82–15 84.5% #1 2,126 3 21 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1994 74–9 89.2% #1 2,196 5 31 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1995 66–17 79.5% #1 2,134 7 36 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1996 66–10 86.8% #1 2,183 8 44 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1997 55–10 84.6% #1 2,187 10 52 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1998 61–18 77.2% #1 2,042 11 56 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 1999 38–9 80.9% #3 2,117 12 61 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 2000 40–11 78.4% #3 2,068 13 63 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 2001 33–15 68.8% #10 2,003 13 63 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 2002 25–14 64.1% #13 1,977 14 64 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2