H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Pete Sampras vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 2-0

Pete Sampras holds a 2–0 lead over Juan Ignacio Chela in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pete Sampras leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 2002 Australian Open second round 6-3 7-5 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pete Sampras
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Juan Ignacio Chela
ARG Age 46 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 18, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Pete Sampras #10 6-3 7-5 3-6 6-4 Juan Ignacio Chela #55 Match data
Jan 21, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Pete Sampras #3 6-4 4-6 4-6 7-5 6-2 Juan Ignacio Chela #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pete Sampras #34 #1 5,792 2,265 737 208 78.0% 14 11 7 0 32 64
Juan Ignacio Chela #967 #15 1,510 1,909 306 268 53.3% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pete Sampras Juan Ignacio Chela
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 10–10 50.0% #97 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1989 18–19 48.6% #81 1,699 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1990 51–19 72.9% #5 2,047 1 4 — — — — — — —
19 1991 52–17 75.4% #6 2,091 1 8 1999 0–3 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0
20 1992 66–15 81.5% #3 2,118 1 13 2000 13–15 46.4% #63 1,540 0 1
21 1993 82–15 84.5% #1 2,126 3 21 2001 10–10 50.0% #70 1,594 0 1
22 1994 74–9 89.2% #1 2,196 5 31 2002 44–27 62.0% #23 1,783 0 2
23 1995 66–17 79.5% #1 2,134 7 36 2003 35–27 56.5% #38 1,762 0 2
24 1996 66–10 86.8% #1 2,183 8 44 2004 33–25 56.9% #26 1,735 0 3
25 1997 55–10 84.6% #1 2,187 10 52 2005 28–26 51.9% #39 1,691 0 3
26 1998 61–18 77.2% #1 2,042 11 56 2006 27–26 50.9% #33 1,721 0 3
27 1999 38–9 80.9% #3 2,117 12 61 2007 39–23 62.9% #20 1,796 0 4
28 2000 40–11 78.4% #3 2,068 13 63 2008 11–12 47.8% #140 1,737 0 4
29 2001 33–15 68.8% #10 2,003 13 63 2009 9–14 39.1% #73 1,731 0 4
30 2002 25–14 64.1% #13 1,977 14 64 2010 28–24 53.8% #38 1,835 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2011 24–24 50.0% #29 1,737 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2012 5–12 29.4% #176 1,634 0 6