H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Pete Sampras vs Karim Alami H2H: 1-1
Pete Sampras and Karim Alami are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 2000 Canada Masters third round 7-6(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2000* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Pete Sampras | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Karim Alami | Match data |
| Jan 6, 1994* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Karim Alami | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | Pete Sampras | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | #34 | #1 | 5,792 | 2,265 | 737 | 208 | 78.0% | 14 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 32 | 64 |
| Karim Alami | #1,418 | #25 | 1,196 | 1,798 | 140 | 177 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pete Sampras | Karim Alami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #81 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 52–17 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,091 | 1 | 8 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #3 | 2,118 | 1 | 13 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 82–15 | 84.5% | #1 | 2,126 | 3 | 21 | 1994 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 74–9 | 89.2% | #1 | 2,196 | 5 | 31 | 1995 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #73 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 66–17 | 79.5% | #1 | 2,134 | 7 | 36 | 1996 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #56 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1996 | 66–10 | 86.8% | #1 | 2,183 | 8 | 44 | 1997 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #55 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1997 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #1 | 2,187 | 10 | 52 | 1998 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #72 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1998 | 61–18 | 77.2% | #1 | 2,042 | 11 | 56 | 1999 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1999 | 38–9 | 80.9% | #3 | 2,117 | 12 | 61 | 2000 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2000 | 40–11 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,068 | 13 | 63 | 2001 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #203 | 1,512 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2001 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #10 | 2,003 | 13 | 63 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #479 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2002 | 25–14 | 64.1% | #13 | 1,977 | 14 | 64 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #990 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |