H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pete Sampras vs Marc Kevin Goellner H2H: 2-0
Pete Sampras holds a 2–0 lead over Marc Kevin Goellner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pete Sampras leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 1998 US Open first round 6-3 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 55
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1998* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Pete Sampras | 6-3 6-3 6-2 | Marc Kevin Goellner | Match data |
| Jun 17, 1995* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Pete Sampras | 6-7(4) 6-2 13-11 | Marc Kevin Goellner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | #34 | #1 | 5,792 | 2,265 | 737 | 208 | 78.0% | 14 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 32 | 64 |
| Marc Kevin Goellner | #1,172 | #26 | 1,072 | 1,841 | 152 | 188 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pete Sampras | Marc Kevin Goellner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #81 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 52–17 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,091 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #3 | 2,118 | 1 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1993 | 82–15 | 84.5% | #1 | 2,126 | 3 | 21 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 74–9 | 89.2% | #1 | 2,196 | 5 | 31 | 1993 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #32 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1995 | 66–17 | 79.5% | #1 | 2,134 | 7 | 36 | 1994 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 66–10 | 86.8% | #1 | 2,183 | 8 | 44 | 1995 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #78 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #1 | 2,187 | 10 | 52 | 1996 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #53 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1998 | 61–18 | 77.2% | #1 | 2,042 | 11 | 56 | 1997 | 22–34 | 39.3% | #51 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1999 | 38–9 | 80.9% | #3 | 2,117 | 12 | 61 | 1998 | 11–25 | 30.6% | #118 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2000 | 40–11 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,068 | 13 | 63 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #324 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2001 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #10 | 2,003 | 13 | 63 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #189 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2002 | 25–14 | 64.1% | #13 | 1,977 | 14 | 64 | 2001 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #176 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #311 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |