H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Pete Sampras vs Michael Llodra H2H: 2-0

Pete Sampras holds a 2–0 lead over Michael Llodra in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pete Sampras leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 2000 Canada Masters second round 5-7 6-2 7-6(4).

USA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 0
2 main draw meetings
FRA Age 46 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 2, 2000* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Pete Sampras #2 5-7 6-2 7-6(4) Michael Llodra #142 Match data
Jun 16, 2000* Queen's Club ATP 250 R16 Grass Pete Sampras #4 6-1 7-6(2) Michael Llodra #169 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pete Sampras #34 #1 5,792 2,265 737 208 78.0% 14 11 7 0 32 64
Michael Llodra #631 #21 1,575 1,901 182 215 45.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pete Sampras Michael Llodra
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 10–10 50.0% #97 1,605 0 0
17 1989 18–19 48.6% #81 1,699 0 0
18 1990 51–19 72.9% #5 2,047 1 4
19 1991 52–17 75.4% #6 2,091 1 8
20 1992 66–15 81.5% #3 2,118 1 13 2000 5–7 41.7% #159 1,598 0 0
21 1993 82–15 84.5% #1 2,126 3 21 2001 6–11 35.3% #89 1,602 0 0
22 1994 74–9 89.2% #1 2,196 5 31 2002 12–17 41.4% #104 1,620 0 0
23 1995 66–17 79.5% #1 2,134 7 36 2003 2–10 16.7% #173 1,590 0 0
24 1996 66–10 86.8% #1 2,183 8 44 2004 20–12 62.5% #41 1,734 0 1
25 1997 55–10 84.6% #1 2,187 10 52 2005 10–20 33.3% #136 1,625 0 1
26 1998 61–18 77.2% #1 2,042 11 56 2006 4–8 33.3% #96 1,608 0 1
27 1999 38–9 80.9% #3 2,117 12 61 2007 13–18 41.9% #93 1,640 0 1
28 2000 40–11 78.4% #3 2,068 13 63 2008 21–19 52.5% #40 1,725 0 3
29 2001 33–15 68.8% #10 2,003 13 63 2009 17–16 51.5% #67 1,738 0 3
30 2002 25–14 64.1% #13 1,977 14 64 2010 27–21 56.2% #23 1,879 0 5
31 2011 17–21 44.7% #47 1,776 0 5
32 2012 12–14 46.2% #53 1,842 0 5
33 2013 12–15 44.4% #105 1,787 0 5
34 2014 4–6 40.0% #269 1,688 0 5