H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Pete Sampras vs Peter Lundgren H2H: 1-1

Pete Sampras and Peter Lundgren are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Peter Lundgren leads 1–0 on carpet, while Pete Sampras leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 1990 US Open round of 64 6-4 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pete Sampras
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Peter Lundgren
SWE Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pete Sampras #12 6-4 6-3 6-3 Peter Lundgren #72 Match data Aug 31, 1990* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Peter Lundgren #94 6-4 6-4 Pete Sampras #68 Match data Nov 8, 1989* R64 Stockholm Open ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pete Sampras #34 #1 5,792 2,265 739 209 78.0% 14 11 7 12 20 64
Peter Lundgren #472 #25 619 1,867 119 136 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pete Sampras Peter Lundgren
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 10–10 50.0% #97 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1989 18–19 48.6% #81 1,700 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1990 51–19 72.9% #5 2,071 1 4 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,515 0 0
19 1991 52–17 75.4% #6 2,098 1 8 — — — — — — —
20 1992 68–16 81.0% #3 2,111 1 13 1985 8–4 66.7% #31 1,671 0 1
21 1993 82–15 84.5% #1 2,126 3 21 1986 15–22 40.5% #98 1,640 0 1
22 1994 74–9 89.2% #1 2,194 5 31 1987 28–17 62.2% #26 1,837 0 3
23 1995 66–17 79.5% #1 2,165 7 36 1988 20–21 48.8% #66 1,738 0 3
24 1996 66–10 86.8% #1 2,198 8 44 1989 12–14 46.2% #71 1,703 0 3
25 1997 55–10 84.6% #1 2,189 10 52 1990 15–18 45.5% #65 1,713 0 3
26 1998 61–18 77.2% #1 2,059 11 56 1991 13–25 34.2% #138 1,609 0 3
27 1999 38–9 80.9% #3 2,147 12 61 1992 5–8 38.5% #213 1,579 0 3
28 2000 40–11 78.4% #3 2,082 13 63 1993 0–1 0.0% #254 1,569 0 3
29 2001 33–15 68.8% #10 2,005 13 63 1994 1–4 20.0% #386 1,534 0 3
30 2002 25–14 64.1% #13 1,979 14 64 1995 1–1 50.0% #384 1,535 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pete Sampras Peter Lundgren
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 13 10 23 56.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 27 9 36 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 1983 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1991 25 7 32 78.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 19 4 23 82.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 22 4 26 84.6% 21 6 27 77.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 18 4 22 81.8% 1985 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1993 43 6 49 87.8% 11 3 14 78.6% 7 1 8 87.5% 21 5 26 80.8% 1986 9 10 19 47.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0%
22 1994 36 2 38 94.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 11 1 12 91.7% 17 5 22 77.3% 1987 22 10 32 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 1995 35 6 41 85.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 12 0 12 100.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 1988 16 14 30 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1996 47 4 51 92.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1989 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 1997 34 5 39 87.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
26 1998 33 12 45 73.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 11 2 13 84.6% 1991 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 1999 23 6 29 79.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2000 28 8 36 77.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 26 10 36 72.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2002 19 8 27 70.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 419 104 523 80.1% 74 41 115 64.3% 102 19 121 84.3% 144 45 189 76.2% — 81 73 154 52.6% 1 18 19 5.3% 17 17 34 50.0% 20 28 48 41.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 652/821 of Pete Sampras's and 50/59 of Peter Lundgren's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Pete Sampras Peter Lundgren
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1991 60/69 7.6 2.2 59.0% 76.3% 57.9% 66.2% 45.3% 68.7% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 70/84 9.5 2.9 60.0% 79.9% 53.5% 60.1% 47.8% 69.2% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 81/97 10.6 3.5 56.9% 82.3% 54.0% 63.2% 47.3% 70.1% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 58/83 9.8 3.4 58.1% 81.3% 54.3% 65.2% 47.0% 70.0% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1995 67/83 11.9 3.7 55.2% 82.2% 52.4% 65.4% 46.8% 69.1% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1996 58/76 12.0 3.1 59.2% 83.7% 54.2% 65.6% 39.7% 71.7% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1997 46/65 11.1 2.4 63.8% 81.8% 54.1% 65.3% 51.8% 71.9% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1998 59/79 11.9 4.5 57.9% 82.7% 51.0% 56.2% 43.2% 69.4% 39.0% 1991 29/38 4.6 5.1 52.7% 68.7% 47.7% 58.6% 41.7% 58.6% 35.2%
27 1999 37/47 10.5 4.4 59.7% 83.2% 55.2% 66.2% 47.1% 71.8% 37.3% 1992 13/13 5.2 4.5 49.9% 71.2% 50.6% 46.2% 36.3% 60.8% 34.3%
28 2000 41/51 13.4 5.8 62.2% 82.3% 55.6% 74.4% 44.4% 72.0% 36.1% 1993 1/1 8.0 4.0 50.0% 74.4% 53.5% 57.1% 18.2% 64.0% 37.3%
29 2001 44/48 12.4 5.6 59.5% 79.3% 53.1% 63.0% 40.5% 68.6% 36.1% 1994 5/5 4.2 4.2 52.0% 63.0% 48.2% 44.9% 30.1% 56.2% 38.3%
30 2002 31/39 14.3 5.5 59.0% 78.9% 53.3% 70.8% 33.9% 68.4% 34.5% 1995 2/2 5.0 2.0 56.8% 74.6% 66.3% 80.0% 50.0% 71.2% 34.3%
Career — 652/948 11.0 3.7 58.9% 81.2% 54.0% 64.5% 45.1% 70.0% 39.2% — 50/255 4.8 4.7 52.0% 69.1% 49.3% 54.8% 39.0% 59.5% 35.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pete Sampras Peter Lundgren
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1988 1605 132.8 — — — — +23 — — 51.0% +0.18 3–4 (43%) 6–5 (55%) — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1701 135.8 — — — — -1 -173 -130 47.4% -0.27 4–4 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — -2.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 2071 160.6 — — — — +20 — -383 65.9% +0.85 24–8 (75%) 26–13 (67%) — -2.17 1983 1515 107.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — -0.11
19 1991 2098 164.6 +6.99 +2.19 1.279 54.1% +51 -499 -378 68.2% +1.31 14–7 (67%) 16–12 (57%) — -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 2111 166.3 +7.26 +3.06 1.321 54.7% +34 -198 -262 71.5% +1.30 22–3 (88%) 35–18 (66%) — -1.57 1985 1671 134.7 — — — — +36 — — 58.1% +0.48 4–0 (100%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.03
21 1993 2127 167.2 +8.23 +3.50 1.371 55.1% +15 -160 -113 77.6% +1.73 16–6 (73%) 28–22 (56%) — -1.62 1986 1640 129.6 — — — — +37 -156 -99 41.6% -0.36 5–4 (56%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.30
22 1994 2194 169.2 +7.95 +5.11 1.421 55.8% +15 -139 -39 79.6% +1.81 15–2 (88%) 27–8 (77%) — -2.38 1987 1837 150.0 — — — — +48 -397 — 58.0% +0.66 7–4 (64%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.26
23 1995 2165 170.5 +7.26 +3.01 1.294 54.4% +37 -219 +25 74.1% +1.54 15–10 (60%) 20–20 (50%) — -1.91 1988 1738 134.2 — — — — +24 — -181 48.5% +0.13 2–4 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19
24 1996 2199 167.2 +8.71 +0.98 1.301 53.8% +61 -193 +28 74.8% +1.39 20–3 (87%) 25–17 (60%) — -1.43 1989 1703 123.9 — — — — -64 — +20 47.1% -0.34 1–3 (25%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.44
25 1997 2190 167.4 +8.72 +3.37 1.448 55.9% +63 -229 +71 78.0% +1.87 9–6 (60%) 16–12 (57%) — -2.11 1990 1713 139.5 — — — — +23 — -6 46.8% -0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.25
26 1998 2059 161.9 +7.08 +1.75 1.275 54.0% +15 -94 +229 74.7% +1.39 9–8 (53%) 28–12 (70%) — -0.82 1991 1610 134.1 -1.57 -2.37 0.850 47.2% +11 -201 +101 38.8% -0.51 4–6 (40%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.36
27 1999 2148 155.5 +7.60 +1.27 1.324 54.7% -37 -226 +160 79.4% +1.41 7–2 (78%) 16–6 (73%) — -0.96 1992 1580 113.5 -1.29 -1.70 0.876 47.8% +29 — — 37.5% -0.44 3–1 (75%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.85
28 2000 2083 156.4 +8.30 +0.43 1.291 53.8% +27 -224 +338 73.6% +1.23 7–5 (58%) 26–8 (76%) — -0.90 1993 1570 104.4 +0.11 -1.94 1.034 49.0% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01
29 2001 2005 152.3 +5.67 -0.75 1.152 52.0% +58 -227 +334 63.5% +0.59 8–6 (57%) 25–11 (69%) — -0.69 1994 1534 101.7 -1.08 -1.39 0.875 47.1% +40 — — 25.0% -1.08 1–1 0–1 — +0.11
30 2002 1979 148.1 +4.66 -1.01 1.091 51.2% +98 -235 +233 60.9% +0.60 9–6 (60%) 14–9 (61%) — -0.90 1995 1536 100.9 +2.06 -2.27 1.192 52.6% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — 0–1 — +0.29
Career — 2266 167.8 +7.49 +2.21 1.307 54.3% +32 -199 +20 71.6% +1.28 182–80 (69%) 314–178 (64%) 107.8 -2.20 — 1868 140.9 -1.27 -2.09 0.872 47.6% +23 -231 -8 46.8% -0.06 32–28 (53%) 34–44 (44%) 99.2 +0.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.