H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Pete Sampras vs Richey Reneberg H2H: 6-2

Pete Sampras holds a 6–2 lead over Richey Reneberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Pete Sampras leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 1996 Wimbledon first round 4-6 6-4 6-3 6-3.

USA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
USA Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 26, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Pete Sampras #1 4-6 6-4 6-3 6-3 Richey Reneberg #21 Match data
Apr 21, 1996* Tokyo ATP 250 F Hard Pete Sampras #1 6-4 7-5 Richey Reneberg #63 Match data
Feb 22, 1996* Memphis ATP 250 R32 Hard Pete Sampras #1 6-3 7-6(4) Richey Reneberg #59 Match data
Nov 11, 1994* Antwerp ATP 250 R16 Carpet Pete Sampras #1 6-3 6-3 Richey Reneberg #34 Match data
Jun 24, 1994* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Pete Sampras #1 6-3 6-4 6-2 Richey Reneberg #35 Match data
Feb 20, 1993* Philadelphia ATP 250 QF Carpet Pete Sampras #2 4-6 6-4 7-6(6) Richey Reneberg #69 Match data
Aug 18, 1990* Indianapolis ATP 250 QF Hard Richey Reneberg #42 3-6 6-1 7-6 Pete Sampras #12 Match data
Mar 8, 1990* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Richey Reneberg #42 4-6 6-4 6-2 Pete Sampras #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pete Sampras #34 #1 5,792 2,265 737 208 78.0% 14 11 7 0 32 64
Richey Reneberg #867 #20 1,333 1,923 305 261 53.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pete Sampras Richey Reneberg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 10–10 50.0% #97 1,605 0 0
17 1989 18–19 48.6% #81 1,699 0 0
18 1990 51–19 72.9% #5 2,047 1 4
19 1991 52–17 75.4% #6 2,091 1 8
20 1992 66–15 81.5% #3 2,118 1 13 1986 2–3 40.0% #337 1,512 0 0
21 1993 82–15 84.5% #1 2,126 3 21 1987 15–13 53.6% #79 1,671 0 0
22 1994 74–9 89.2% #1 2,196 5 31 1988 14–19 42.4% #128 1,675 0 0
23 1995 66–17 79.5% #1 2,134 7 36 1989 23–21 52.3% #80 1,689 0 0
24 1996 66–10 86.8% #1 2,183 8 44 1990 37–25 59.7% #23 1,821 0 0
25 1997 55–10 84.6% #1 2,187 10 52 1991 32–18 64.0% #27 1,805 0 1
26 1998 61–18 77.2% #1 2,042 11 56 1992 18–20 47.4% #95 1,712 0 1
27 1999 38–9 80.9% #3 2,117 12 61 1993 37–26 58.7% #30 1,755 0 2
28 2000 40–11 78.4% #3 2,068 13 63 1994 33–24 57.9% #34 1,809 0 2
29 2001 33–15 68.8% #10 2,003 13 63 1995 22–23 48.9% #57 1,773 0 2
30 2002 25–14 64.1% #13 1,977 14 64 1996 37–24 60.7% #32 1,815 0 3
31 1997 18–20 47.4% #73 1,682 0 3
32 1998 10–15 40.0% #154 1,596 0 3
33 1999 6–9 40.0% #202 1,626 0 3
34 2000 1–1 50.0% #573 1,631 0 3