H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Pete Sampras vs Todd Martin H2H: 18-4

Pete Sampras holds a 18–4 lead over Todd Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 22 main-draw meetings, Pete Sampras leads 10–3 on hard courts and 4–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 2002 Houston quarterfinal 6-2 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pete Sampras
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
18 – 4
22 main draw meetings
Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 27, 2002* Houston ATP 250 QF Clay Pete Sampras #14 6-2 7-6(3) Todd Martin #46 Match data
Jan 3, 2002* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Todd Martin #57 3-6 6-3 6-4 Pete Sampras #10 Match data
Jan 24, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Todd Martin #54 6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 6-4 Pete Sampras #3 Match data
Nov 8, 1998* Paris Masters Masters 1000 SF Carpet Pete Sampras #1 6-4 7-6(5) Todd Martin #26 Match data
Oct 22, 1998* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Pete Sampras #1 6-4 1-6 6-4 Todd Martin #25 Match data
Oct 17, 1998* Vienna ATP 250 SF Carpet Pete Sampras #1 6-3 7-6(4) Todd Martin #29 Match data
May 27, 1998* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Pete Sampras #1 6-4 6-3 6-3 Todd Martin #33 Match data
Mar 12, 1998* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Pete Sampras #1 6-1 7-5 Todd Martin #72 Match data
Feb 15, 1997* San Jose ATP 250 SF Hard Pete Sampras #1 6-2 6-3 Todd Martin #14 Match data
Jun 2, 1996* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Pete Sampras #1 3-6 6-4 7-5 4-6 6-2 Todd Martin #18 Match data
Mar 23, 1996* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Pete Sampras #2 6-3 6-4 Todd Martin #18 Match data
Feb 25, 1996* Memphis ATP 250 F Hard Pete Sampras #1 6-4 7-6(2) Todd Martin #22 Match data
Oct 21, 1995* Lyon ATP 250 SF Carpet Pete Sampras #2 7-6(2) 6-4 Todd Martin #20 Match data
Sep 6, 1995* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Pete Sampras #2 7-6(4) 6-3 6-4 Todd Martin #16 Match data
Aug 12, 1995* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Pete Sampras #2 6-7(2) 6-4 7-6(4) Todd Martin #17 Match data
Mar 12, 1995* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Pete Sampras #1 6-3 6-4 Todd Martin #13 Match data
Feb 18, 1995* Memphis ATP 250 SF Hard Todd Martin #16 4-6 7-6(6) 6-4 Pete Sampras #1 Match data
Jul 3, 1994* Wimbledon Grand Slam SF Grass Pete Sampras #1 6-4 6-4 3-6 6-3 Todd Martin #9 Match data
Jun 12, 1994* Queen's Club ATP 250 F Grass Todd Martin #9 7-6(4) 7-6(4) Pete Sampras #1 Match data
Jan 31, 1994* Australian Open Grand Slam F Hard Pete Sampras #1 7-6(4) 6-4 6-4 Todd Martin #8 Match data
Mar 14, 1993* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Pete Sampras #2 6-3 6-4 Todd Martin #45 Match data
Sep 6, 1992* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Pete Sampras #3 7-6(1) 2-6 4-6 7-5 6-4 Todd Martin #93 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pete Sampras #34 #1 5,792 2,265 737 208 78.0% 14 11 7 0 32 64
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,063 398 222 64.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pete Sampras Todd Martin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 10–10 50.0% #97 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1989 18–19 48.6% #81 1,699 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1990 51–19 72.9% #5 2,047 1 4 — — — — — — —
19 1991 52–17 75.4% #6 2,091 1 8 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,508 0 0
20 1992 66–15 81.5% #3 2,118 1 13 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,648 0 0
21 1993 82–15 84.5% #1 2,126 3 21 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0
22 1994 74–9 89.2% #1 2,196 5 31 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1
23 1995 66–17 79.5% #1 2,134 7 36 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,943 0 3
24 1996 66–10 86.8% #1 2,183 8 44 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,912 0 4
25 1997 55–10 84.6% #1 2,187 10 52 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,926 0 5
26 1998 61–18 77.2% #1 2,042 11 56 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,914 0 5
27 1999 38–9 80.9% #3 2,117 12 61 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7
28 2000 40–11 78.4% #3 2,068 13 63 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8
29 2001 33–15 68.8% #10 2,003 13 63 2000 14–11 56.0% #55 1,887 0 8
30 2002 25–14 64.1% #13 1,977 14 64 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,823 0 8
31 — — — — — — — 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,788 0 8
32 — — — — — — — 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,828 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,684 0 8