H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Peter Doohan vs Brian Teacher H2H: 0-2
Brian Teacher holds a 2–0 lead over Peter Doohan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Brian Teacher leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Brian Teacher won the 1985 Sydney Indoor third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 71
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 1985* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Brian Teacher | 6-1 6-2 | Peter Doohan | Match data |
| Jun 5, 1980* | Manchester | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Brian Teacher | 6-2 6-4 | Peter Doohan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Doohan | #1,102 | #43 | 140 | 1,737 | 50 | 82 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Brian Teacher | #938 | #7 | 0 | 2,043 | 338 | 237 | 58.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Peter Doohan | Brian Teacher | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #121 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #109 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #81 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 31–31 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #85 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #31 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1985 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #101 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1986 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 63–26 | 70.8% | #20 | 2,039 | 1 | 4 |
| 26 | 1987 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #9 | 1,987 | 1 | 5 |
| 27 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #19 | 1,935 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | 1989 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #29 | 1,822 | 1 | 8 |
| 29 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,435 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #53 | 1,765 | 1 | 8 |
| 30 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1131 | 1,427 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #66 | 1,708 | 1 | 8 |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #104 | 1,618 | 1 | 8 |