H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Peter Doohan vs Francisco Gonzalez H2H: 1-0
Peter Doohan holds a 1–0 lead over Francisco Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Doohan leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Peter Doohan won the 1985 Adelaide third round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
PAR
Age 70
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 1985* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Peter Doohan | 6-4 7-6 | Francisco Gonzalez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Doohan | #1,102 | #43 | 140 | 1,737 | 50 | 82 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Francisco Gonzalez | #997 | #40 | 0 | 1,758 | 105 | 157 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Peter Doohan | Francisco Gonzalez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #85 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #77 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #101 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #74 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1986 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1987 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #98 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #99 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1989 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #82 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,435 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #140 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1131 | 1,427 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |