H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Peter Doohan vs Steve Shaw H2H: 1-1
Peter Doohan and Steve Shaw are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Peter Doohan leads 1–0 on clay, while Steve Shaw leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Steve Shaw won the 1988 Bristol fourth round 3-6 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 63
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 1988* | Bristol | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Steve Shaw | 3-6 7-6 6-4 | Peter Doohan | Match data |
| May 8, 1985* | Forest Hills | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Peter Doohan | 7-6 6-4 | Steve Shaw | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Doohan | #1,102 | #43 | 140 | 1,737 | 50 | 82 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Steve Shaw | #831 | #88 | 7 | 1,613 | 23 | 41 | 35.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Peter Doohan | Steve Shaw | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1982 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #85 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #101 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #162 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1986 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #239 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1987 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1989 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,435 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1131 | 1,427 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |