H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Peter Fleming vs Dick Stockton H2H: 2-5

Dick Stockton holds a 5–2 lead over Peter Fleming in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Dick Stockton leads 3–0 on carpet, while Peter Fleming leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Fleming won the 1981 Columbus fourth round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Peter Fleming
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main draw meetings
Dick Stockton
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 7, 1981* Columbus ATP 250 R16 Hard Peter Fleming #98 7-5 6-2 Dick Stockton #138 Match data
Dec 12, 1978 Wct Challenge Cup ATP 250 RR Hard Peter Fleming #27 2-6 6-4 6-4 Dick Stockton #19 Match data
Jul 10, 1978 Forest Hills Wct ATP 250 RR Clay Dick Stockton #15 7-6 3-6 6-3 Peter Fleming #40 Match data
Feb 16, 1978* St. Louis Wct ATP 250 R16 Carpet Dick Stockton #10 6-1 7-6 Peter Fleming #38 Match data
Jan 13, 1978* Birmingham Wct ATP 250 R16 Carpet Dick Stockton #10 7-5 6-2 Peter Fleming #47 Match data
Dec 30, 1976* Sydney Outdoor ATP 250 R16 Grass Dick Stockton #15 6-4 6-3 Peter Fleming #116 Match data
Sep 30, 1975* San Francisco ATP 250 R16 Carpet Dick Stockton #19 6-4 4-6 6-3 Peter Fleming #183 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Peter Fleming #933 #8 0 2,046 224 214 51.1% 0 1 0 0 2 3
Dick Stockton #808 #8 0 2,122 386 267 59.1% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Peter Fleming Dick Stockton
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,495 0 0 1968 2–4 33.3% — 1,476 0 0
18 1973 1–2 33.3% — 1,492 0 0 1969 4–9 30.8% — 1,458 0 0
19 1974 0–2 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1970 8–9 47.1% — 1,557 0 0
20 1975 6–7 46.2% #120 1,541 0 0 1971 13–9 59.1% — 1,688 0 0
21 1976 15–14 51.7% #116 1,635 0 0 1972 26–20 56.5% — 1,773 0 0
22 1977 31–28 52.5% #47 1,813 0 0 1973 38–24 61.3% #27 1,810 0 0
23 1978 43–31 58.1% #26 1,953 0 1 1974 42–20 67.7% #15 1,917 0 2
24 1979 45–26 63.4% #13 1,916 0 3 1975 39–21 65.0% #30 1,844 0 3
25 1980 21–19 52.5% #37 1,768 0 3 1976 58–26 69.0% #15 1,988 0 4
26 1981 9–13 40.9% #99 1,733 0 3 1977 56–23 70.9% #10 1,993 0 7
27 1982 2–6 25.0% #106 1,653 0 3 1978 46–27 63.0% #19 1,921 0 8
28 1983 14–11 56.0% #32 1,765 0 3 1979 20–21 48.8% #55 1,759 0 8
29 1984 18–19 48.6% #51 1,735 0 3 1980 11–16 40.7% #138 1,714 0 8
30 1985 9–12 42.9% #94 1,686 0 3 1981 14–15 48.3% #98 1,750 0 8
31 1986 6–10 37.5% #103 1,656 0 3 1982 8–18 30.8% #85 1,654 0 8
32 1987 4–13 23.5% #174 1,561 0 3 1983 1–2 33.3% #184 1,640 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 1984 0–3 0.0% #609 1,602 0 8