H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Peter Fleming vs John Austin H2H: 2-0

Peter Fleming holds a 2–0 lead over John Austin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Peter Fleming leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Fleming won the 1980 Indian Wells Open round of 32 2-6 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Peter Fleming
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
John Austin
USA Age 69 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Peter Fleming #14 2-6 6-1 7-5 John Austin Match data Feb 14, 1980* R32 Indian Wells Open ATP 250 Hard
Peter Fleming #34 6-4 6-2 John Austin Match data Sep 21, 1978* R32 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Peter Fleming #933 #8 0 2,050 224 214 51.1% 0 0 0 1 2 3
John Austin — — — 1,771 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Peter Fleming John Austin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1973 1–2 33.3% — 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1974 0–2 0.0% — 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1975 6–7 46.2% #120 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1976 15–14 51.7% #116 1,636 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1977 31–28 52.5% #47 1,816 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1978 43–31 58.1% #26 1,955 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1979 45–26 63.4% #13 1,920 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 1980 21–19 52.5% #37 1,769 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 1981 9–13 40.9% #99 1,734 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1982 2–6 25.0% — 1,654 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1983 14–11 56.0% #32 1,765 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1984 18–19 48.6% #51 1,735 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1985 9–12 42.9% #94 1,686 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1986 6–10 37.5% #103 1,657 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1987 4–13 23.5% #174 1,561 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Peter Fleming John Austin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1972 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1973 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1974 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1977 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
21 1976 4 3 7 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1979 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1977 11 8 19 57.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 14 8 22 63.6% 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1978 20 11 31 64.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 16 9 25 64.0% 1981 12 9 21 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1979 20 7 27 74.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 23 12 35 65.7% 1982 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 1980 9 7 16 56.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1981 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1982 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 94 77 171 55.0% 22 36 58 37.9% 18 27 45 40.0% 90 74 164 54.9% — 26 31 57 45.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 5 15 20 25.0% 12 22 34 35.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Peter Fleming John Austin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1498 107.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.26
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1501 100.3 — — — — — — — 60.0% +1.20 0–1 0–1 — +0.43
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1552 108.7 — — — — +72 — — 63.6% +0.54 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.64
17 1972 1495 104.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1973 1493 101.0 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.13 1976 1515 94.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.47
19 1974 1486 109.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 1–1 — -0.26 1977 1509 112.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — -0.30
20 1975 1542 115.0 — — — — +62 -29 — 50.0% +0.04 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +1.11 1978 1579 133.8 — — — — +76 -63 — 37.3% -0.67 6–3 (67%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.39
21 1976 1637 132.6 — — — — -4 -61 -52 53.7% +0.48 3–6 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — +2.59 1979 1567 125.0 — — — — +46 — -27 34.0% -1.17 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.37
22 1977 1816 148.6 — — — — +64 -251 -244 52.9% +0.24 12–15 (44%) 11–15 (42%) — -2.07 1980 1721 131.1 — — — — -31 — -109 50.0% -0.09 3–3 (50%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.09
23 1978 1956 158.7 — — — — +60 -329 -387 55.4% +0.43 19–14 (58%) 11–15 (42%) — -4.63 1981 1749 143.2 — — — — +35 — -177 48.1% -0.21 5–3 (63%) 6–3 (67%) — -2.01
24 1979 1920 159.8 — — — — +93 -345 -335 60.1% +0.60 10–7 (59%) 5–13 (28%) — -0.84 1982 1659 109.4 — — — — +32 — — 0.0% -3.27 — 0–3 (0%) — -1.11
25 1980 1770 138.7 — — — — +76 -207 -83 52.3% +0.24 5–6 (45%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.13 1983 1579 98.0 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.39
26 1981 1735 139.0 — — — — +22 — -40 41.5% -0.53 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -2.84 1984 1559 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.26
27 1982 1654 112.6 — — — — +28 — — 33.3% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 1766 140.3 — — — — +9 — -91 55.4% +0.31 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.68 1986 1540 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.19
29 1984 1735 141.3 — — — — +24 -182 — 47.9% +0.03 8–7 (53%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 1686 134.6 — — — — +30 — — 50.9% -0.14 1–7 (13%) 5–1 (83%) — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1657 132.9 — — — — +2 — — 41.5% -0.63 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 1561 118.4 — — — — +12 — +36 32.6% -1.12 0–5 (0%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2050 152.1 — — — — +50 -216 -151 51.5% +0.14 73–84 (46%) 73–84 (46%) 95.4 -1.76 — 1771 135.8 — — — — +32 -63 -105 39.6% -0.70 17–18 (49%) 20–25 (44%) 100.0 -0.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.