H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Peter Gojowczyk vs Leonardo Mayer H2H: 1-1

Peter Gojowczyk and Leonardo Mayer are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Leonardo Mayer leads 1–0 on clay, while Peter Gojowczyk leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Gojowczyk won the 2017 Chengdu Open first round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Peter Gojowczyk
GER Age 37 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Leonardo Mayer
ARG Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Peter Gojowczyk #66 6-2 6-2 Leonardo Mayer #54 Match data Sep 28, 2017* R32 Chengdu Open ATP 250 Hard
Leonardo Mayer #46 6-3 6-2 Peter Gojowczyk #115 Match data Jul 16, 2014* R64 Hamburg Open ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Peter Gojowczyk #1,284 #39 1,175 1,884 75 97 43.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Leonardo Mayer #748 #21 1,605 1,938 166 194 46.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Peter Gojowczyk Leonardo Mayer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #494 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — 2008 1–1 50.0% #115 1,476 0 0
22 2012 0–1 0.0% #181 1,585 0 0 2009 18–18 50.0% #75 1,664 0 0
23 2013 1–1 50.0% #162 1,609 0 0 2010 12–19 38.7% #94 1,652 0 0
24 2014 7–8 46.7% #79 1,697 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #78 1,676 0 0
25 2015 1–3 25.0% #194 1,652 0 0 2012 11–14 44.0% #71 1,726 0 0
26 2016 1–2 33.3% #189 1,678 0 0 2013 12–18 40.0% #94 1,718 0 0
27 2017 14–9 60.9% #60 1,809 0 1 2014 26–20 56.5% #28 1,832 0 1
28 2018 23–25 47.9% #59 1,800 0 1 2015 24–23 51.1% #35 1,839 0 1
29 2019 10–21 32.3% #117 1,672 0 1 2016 9–15 37.5% #139 1,729 0 1
30 2020 1–3 25.0% #145 1,622 0 1 2017 11–8 57.9% #52 1,796 0 2
31 2021 13–9 59.1% #86 1,757 0 1 2018 22–25 46.8% #56 1,747 0 2
32 2022 4–14 22.2% #235 1,574 0 1 2019 16–18 47.1% #92 1,710 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2020 0–7 0.0% #135 1,605 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2021 0–1 0.0% #309 1,520 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Peter Gojowczyk Leonardo Mayer
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 11 11 22 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2014 5 4 9 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2016 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2013 3 6 9 33.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2017 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 2014 5 9 14 35.7% 18 10 28 64.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 2018 17 17 34 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 10 12 22 45.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 4 2 6 66.7%
29 2019 8 14 22 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2020 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
31 2021 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2018 9 12 21 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 2022 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2019 6 6 12 50.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 56 66 122 45.9% 7 17 24 29.2% 12 14 26 46.2% — 63 91 154 40.9% 87 84 171 50.9% 16 19 35 45.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 171/172 of Peter Gojowczyk's and 358/360 of Leonardo Mayer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Peter Gojowczyk Leonardo Mayer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2010 1/1 1.0 5.0 64.3% 47.6% 51.4% 30.0% 50.0% 49.0% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/2 7.5 3.5 52.5% 86.6% 51.5% 12.5% 33.3% 69.5% 35.8%
22 2012 1/1 4.0 4.0 58.5% 56.9% 43.1% 47.1% 44.4% 51.2% 38.5% 2009 35/36 6.6 2.6 59.4% 75.3% 53.0% 56.0% 38.7% 66.4% 37.7%
23 2013 2/2 11.5 7.0 53.5% 76.7% 50.7% 63.1% 47.3% 64.8% 39.4% 2010 31/31 6.8 3.3 61.3% 73.8% 51.3% 64.9% 46.1% 65.1% 32.4%
24 2014 15/15 7.4 3.5 57.4% 74.7% 50.2% 69.6% 49.6% 64.1% 35.1% 2011 11/11 3.1 2.8 61.4% 69.3% 55.2% 46.1% 36.0% 63.9% 32.3%
25 2015 4/4 6.5 3.0 54.2% 72.3% 48.8% 60.7% 35.4% 61.5% 41.3% 2012 25/25 6.7 4.0 59.3% 72.1% 51.5% 57.8% 37.7% 63.6% 32.1%
26 2016 3/3 13.3 1.7 61.2% 75.8% 48.3% 70.8% 37.5% 65.1% 26.5% 2013 29/30 4.7 3.7 61.7% 68.6% 50.0% 58.6% 49.2% 61.4% 34.2%
27 2017 23/23 7.6 4.1 54.1% 78.0% 48.0% 53.8% 54.0% 64.1% 37.2% 2014 46/46 6.6 4.1 59.7% 74.5% 53.7% 57.6% 42.4% 66.4% 36.4%
28 2018 48/48 6.9 3.3 54.2% 75.4% 49.2% 55.9% 36.1% 63.2% 35.3% 2015 47/47 6.7 3.0 63.8% 74.8% 54.2% 65.0% 36.3% 67.4% 35.1%
29 2019 31/31 6.2 4.0 54.0% 70.0% 45.3% 54.6% 40.8% 58.7% 33.9% 2016 24/24 4.7 3.5 61.8% 71.4% 48.5% 62.3% 38.0% 62.4% 35.9%
30 2020 4/4 9.3 4.5 57.1% 72.9% 50.7% 50.0% 26.7% 63.2% 33.9% 2017 19/19 6.7 2.7 61.7% 67.4% 53.7% 48.8% 34.0% 63.2% 34.1%
31 2021 22/22 7.6 5.1 51.7% 78.0% 48.0% 65.7% 38.3% 63.5% 35.5% 2018 47/47 6.5 3.3 61.7% 73.6% 53.2% 56.0% 38.6% 65.7% 34.5%
32 2022 17/18 3.9 4.5 52.9% 65.5% 44.5% 51.3% 38.3% 55.6% 32.1% 2019 34/34 7.9 5.0 58.3% 74.7% 53.5% 59.2% 33.6% 65.9% 34.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 7/7 5.3 6.3 58.0% 69.3% 51.3% 60.1% 27.6% 61.8% 26.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 1/1 0.0 6.0 50.8% 76.7% 37.9% 50.0% — 57.6% 24.5%
Career — 171/172 6.9 4.0 54.2% 73.7% 47.8% 57.5% 41.1% 61.7% 35.1% — 358/360 6.3 3.6 60.8% 73.0% 52.6% 58.3% 39.1% 65.1% 34.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Peter Gojowczyk Leonardo Mayer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2007 1484 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1463 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1516 104.5 +0.44 +1.12 0.759 45.0% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.20 2007 1495 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 1506 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1476 101.9 -0.40 -0.71 1.172 51.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–0 — +0.01
22 2012 1585 118.6 -1.08 -5.85 0.788 45.0% — — — 40.0% -1.20 0–1 — — -0.02 2009 1665 131.8 +2.06 +0.49 1.120 51.6% -73 -41 -95 54.7% +0.43 1–8 (11%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.83
23 2013 1610 112.7 -1.87 +0.62 1.118 51.5% — — — 55.6% +0.11 0–1 1–0 — +0.36 2010 1652 134.7 +1.36 -2.46 0.928 48.7% -71 +91 — 42.3% -0.38 4–5 (44%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.68
24 2014 1697 138.1 +0.13 +0.88 0.980 50.0% +27 -187 -115 47.4% -0.16 2–2 (50%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.47 2011 1677 124.2 +0.17 -2.16 0.894 47.8% — +150 — 40.0% -0.87 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.29
25 2015 1653 118.0 +0.17 +0.96 1.073 51.7% +47 — — 33.3% 0.00 — — — +0.08 2012 1726 138.2 +1.16 -3.47 0.882 48.0% -95 +90 -215 42.9% -0.59 2–3 (40%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.21
26 2016 1678 121.7 +1.67 -1.23 0.759 46.8% +42 — — 25.0% -0.88 1–0 0–2 — -0.59 2013 1718 135.8 -0.98 -2.09 0.885 47.8% -75 +59 -185 44.4% -0.56 3–4 (43%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.11
27 2017 1810 134.4 -0.07 +0.58 1.038 50.9% -21 — -60 55.2% +0.15 6–4 (60%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.94 2014 1832 147.6 +2.77 -0.26 1.083 51.2% -185 +142 -147 55.0% +0.19 8–9 (47%) 16–9 (64%) — +0.33
28 2018 1800 151.9 -0.36 -0.06 0.961 49.3% -3 -173 — 46.4% -0.20 11–3 (79%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.51 2015 1839 152.1 +2.61 -0.22 1.077 51.2% -111 +71 -78 53.4% +0.27 5–9 (36%) 16–12 (57%) — +1.37
29 2019 1672 144.1 -3.39 -1.36 0.820 46.7% +60 -106 +26 36.7% -0.85 5–7 (42%) 3–7 (30%) — -1.60 2016 1729 141.4 -0.34 -0.34 0.955 49.2% -17 +71 — 40.7% -0.34 2–3 (40%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.17
30 2020 1623 120.0 -1.23 -1.08 0.921 48.9% +60 — — 30.8% -0.46 — 1–1 — +0.24 2017 1797 137.1 -0.74 -0.87 0.928 48.2% -65 +75 — 57.4% +0.23 5–2 (71%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.32
31 2021 1758 125.5 -0.63 -0.49 0.973 49.7% +19 — -47 54.1% +0.10 7–2 (78%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.90 2018 1747 152.6 +2.05 -1.29 1.007 50.3% -45 +120 -84 50.4% +0.08 8–13 (38%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.16
32 2022 1575 116.4 -5.50 -2.19 0.723 44.1% +37 — +117 16.7% -2.36 — 0–3 (0%) — -0.26 2019 1710 139.9 +1.41 -1.47 1.000 50.0% -11 +88 — 50.0% -0.13 5–9 (36%) 17–9 (65%) — +0.77
33 2023 1567 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1606 116.6 -1.03 -3.14 0.703 45.4% +35 +97 — 23.8% -1.52 0–4 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.19
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1520 93.3 -3.18 -4.11 0.578 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.27
Career — 1885 137.5 -1.36 -0.43 0.916 48.6% +20 -162 -24 43.5% -0.44 32–21 (60%) 29–37 (44%) 103.1 -0.66 — 1939 146.2 +1.33 -1.16 0.989 49.8% -75 +92 -125 48.7% -0.10 44–71 (38%) 106–92 (54%) 97.3 +0.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.