H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Peter Gojowczyk vs Leonardo Mayer H2H: 1-1
Peter Gojowczyk and Leonardo Mayer are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Leonardo Mayer leads 1–0 on clay, while Peter Gojowczyk leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Gojowczyk won the 2017 Chengdu third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 37
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2017* | Chengdu | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Peter Gojowczyk | 6-2 6-2 | Leonardo Mayer | Match data |
| Jul 16, 2014* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Leonardo Mayer | 6-3 6-2 | Peter Gojowczyk | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Gojowczyk | #1,284 | #39 | 1,175 | 1,885 | 75 | 97 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Leonardo Mayer | #748 | #21 | 1,605 | 1,937 | 166 | 194 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Peter Gojowczyk | Leonardo Mayer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #79 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #78 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #59 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #117 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #139 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #52 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2021 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #86 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2022 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #235 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #92 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,520 | 0 | 2 |