H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Peter Luczak vs Alexander Peya H2H: 1-0
Peter Luczak holds a 1–0 lead over Alexander Peya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Luczak leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Peter Luczak won the 2004 Kitzbuhel second round 6-2 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2011 | Casablanca | ATP 250 | Q2 | Clay | Alexander Peya | 7-6(7) 0-6 6-2 | Peter Luczak | Match data |
| Jan 2, 2011 | Brisbane | ATP 250 | Q1 | Hard | Peter Luczak | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Alexander Peya | Match data |
| Jul 21, 2004* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Peter Luczak | 6-2 7-6(4) | Alexander Peya | Match data |
| Aug 27, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | Q2 | Hard | Peter Luczak | 6-2 6-3 | Alexander Peya | Match data |
| Jan 14, 2002 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q1 | Hard | Peter Luczak | 6-2 7-6(2) | Alexander Peya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Luczak | #1,007 | #64 | 775 | 1,685 | 37 | 80 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alexander Peya | #1,044 | #92 | 622 | 1,692 | 18 | 45 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Peter Luczak | Alexander Peya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #187 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #150 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #135 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #166 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #79 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #187 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #156 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #147 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #77 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #269 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2010 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #137 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #271 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #697 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |