H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Peter Lundgren vs Damir Keretic H2H: 0-1
Damir Keretic holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Lundgren in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Damir Keretic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Damir Keretic won the 1986 Bastad third round 6-3 0-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 1986* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Damir Keretic | 6-3 0-6 6-3 | Peter Lundgren | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Lundgren | #472 | #25 | 619 | 1,867 | 119 | 136 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Damir Keretic | #837 | #58 | 35 | 1,740 | 87 | 120 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Peter Lundgren | Damir Keretic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #31 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #239 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #98 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #86 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #71 | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,711 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #138 | 1,608 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #68 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #213 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,566 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #386 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #412 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #384 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |