Peter Lundgren
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | 0 | 8 | 8 | Oct 24, 1991 | H2H |
| Ramesh Krishnan | 5 | 2 | 7 | Mar 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Andrei Chesnokov | 3 | 2 | 5 | Feb 10, 1994 | H2H |
| David Pate | 2 | 3 | 5 | Aug 1, 1991 | H2H |
| Amos Mansdorf | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 15, 1992 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Peter Lundgren vs Dan Cassidy H2H: 1-0
Peter Lundgren holds a 1–0 lead over Dan Cassidy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Lundgren leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Lundgren won the 1988 ASB Classic round of 32 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Lundgren | 6-3 6-4 | Dan Cassidy | Match data | Jan 7, 1988* | R32 | ASB Classic | ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Lundgren | #472 | #25 | 619 | 1,867 | 119 | 136 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Dan Cassidy | #753 | #74 | 187 | 1,629 | 35 | 75 | 31.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Peter Lundgren | Dan Cassidy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #31 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #126 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #98 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #219 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #106 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #71 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 7–21 | 25.0% | #227 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,713 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,456 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #138 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #381 | 1,401 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #213 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,569 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #386 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #384 | 1,535 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Peter Lundgren | Dan Cassidy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1983 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1985 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 1987 | 22 | 10 | 32 | 68.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1986 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1987 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1988 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 1990 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1989 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 1991 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1990 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 1992 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 81 | 73 | 154 | 52.6% | 1 | 18 | 19 | 5.3% | 17 | 17 | 34 | 50.0% | 20 | 28 | 48 | 41.7% | Career | 23 | 41 | 64 | 35.9% | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 1 | 11 | 12 | 8.3% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Peter Lundgren | Dan Cassidy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1983 | 1515 | 107.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.75 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.11 | 1969 | 1486 | 102.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.00 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 1985 | 1671 | 134.7 | — | — | — | — | +36 | — | — | 58.1% | +0.48 | 4–0 (100%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.03 | 1984 | 1630 | 119.1 | — | — | — | — | -17 | — | +2 | 58.3% | +0.25 | 3–3 (50%) | 9–5 (64%) | — | +1.87 |
| 1986 | 1640 | 129.6 | — | — | — | — | +37 | -156 | -99 | 41.6% | -0.36 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | +0.30 | 1985 | 1510 | 112.1 | — | — | — | — | +51 | -19 | +47 | 31.4% | -1.29 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–8 (33%) | — | +0.61 |
| 1987 | 1837 | 150.0 | — | — | — | — | +48 | -397 | — | 58.0% | +0.66 | 7–4 (64%) | 6–4 (60%) | — | +0.26 | 1986 | 1512 | 118.0 | — | — | — | — | +6 | +35 | — | 30.0% | -1.20 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–1 | — | -0.59 |
| 1988 | 1738 | 134.2 | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | -181 | 48.5% | +0.13 | 2–4 (33%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | -0.19 | 1987 | 1565 | 111.6 | — | — | — | — | -9 | -18 | — | 47.1% | -0.23 | 3–0 (100%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.25 |
| 1989 | 1703 | 123.9 | — | — | — | — | -64 | — | +20 | 47.1% | -0.34 | 1–3 (25%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | -0.44 | 1988 | 1515 | 119.8 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -24 | — | 29.2% | -1.37 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–5 (17%) | — | -0.50 |
| 1990 | 1713 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | -6 | 46.8% | -0.09 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–9 (31%) | — | -0.25 | 1989 | 1457 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 37.8% | -1.13 | 0–6 (0%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | +0.90 |
| 1991 | 1610 | 134.1 | -1.57 | -2.37 | 0.850 | 47.2% | +11 | -201 | +101 | 38.8% | -0.51 | 4–6 (40%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | -0.36 | 1990 | 1402 | 99.8 | — | — | — | — | +26 | — | — | 12.5% | -2.44 | 0–2 | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.08 |
| 1992 | 1580 | 113.5 | -1.29 | -1.70 | 0.876 | 47.8% | +29 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.44 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–5 (17%) | — | +0.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1570 | 104.4 | +0.11 | -1.94 | 1.034 | 49.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 1534 | 101.7 | -1.08 | -1.39 | 0.875 | 47.1% | +40 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.08 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 1536 | 100.9 | +2.06 | -2.27 | 1.192 | 52.6% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.25 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1868 | 140.9 | -1.27 | -2.09 | 0.872 | 47.6% | +23 | -231 | -8 | 46.8% | -0.06 | 32–28 (53%) | 34–44 (44%) | 99.2 | +0.16 | Career | 1630 | 118.6 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -6 | +20 | 36.1% | -1.01 | 12–20 (38%) | 19–26 (42%) | 94.0 | +2.31 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Dan Cassidy
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Annacone | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Tim Wilkison | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 6, 1988 | H2H |
| Darren Cahill | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 28, 1988 | H2H |
| Joakim Nystrom | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 10, 1988 | H2H |
| Anders Jarryd | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 15, 1990 | H2H |