H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Peter Lundgren vs Dan Goldie H2H: 2-0
Peter Lundgren holds a 2–0 lead over Dan Goldie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Peter Lundgren leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Lundgren won the 1990 Sydney Indoor second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 1990* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Peter Lundgren | 6-2 6-4 | Dan Goldie | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1987* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Peter Lundgren | 6-1 6-1 | Dan Goldie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Lundgren | #472 | #25 | 619 | 1,867 | 119 | 136 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Dan Goldie | #738 | #27 | 457 | 1,855 | 122 | 117 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Peter Lundgren | Dan Goldie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #31 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #101 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #98 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #265 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #113 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #71 | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #29 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,711 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #67 | 1,735 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #138 | 1,608 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #96 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #213 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #181 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,566 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #386 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #384 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |