H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Peter Lundgren vs Danie Visser H2H: 1-0

Peter Lundgren holds a 1–0 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Lundgren leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Lundgren won the 1987 Los Angeles Open round of 32 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Peter Lundgren
SWE Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Danie Visser
RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Peter Lundgren #49 6-3 6-3 Danie Visser #86 Match data Sep 24, 1987* R32 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Peter Lundgren #472 #25 619 1,867 119 136 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Peter Lundgren Danie Visser
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — 1981 1–2 33.3% — 1,506 0 0
20 1985 8–4 66.7% #31 1,671 0 1 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0
21 1986 15–22 40.5% #98 1,640 0 1 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0
22 1987 28–17 62.2% #26 1,837 0 3 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0
23 1988 20–21 48.8% #66 1,738 0 3 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0
24 1989 12–14 46.2% #71 1,703 0 3 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0
25 1990 15–18 45.5% #65 1,713 0 3 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0
26 1991 13–25 34.2% #138 1,609 0 3 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0
27 1992 5–8 38.5% #213 1,579 0 3 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0
28 1993 0–1 0.0% #254 1,569 0 3 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0
29 1994 1–4 20.0% #386 1,534 0 3 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0
30 1995 1–1 50.0% #384 1,535 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Peter Lundgren Danie Visser
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1983 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1986 9 10 19 47.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1987 22 10 32 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
23 1988 16 14 30 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1989 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1991 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1992 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
28 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1994 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 81 73 154 52.6% 1 18 19 5.3% 17 17 34 50.0% 20 28 48 41.7% — 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 50/59 of Peter Lundgren's and 3/3 of Danie Visser's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Peter Lundgren Danie Visser
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 1991 29/38 4.6 5.1 52.7% 68.7% 47.7% 58.6% 41.7% 58.6% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 13/13 5.2 4.5 49.9% 71.2% 50.6% 46.2% 36.3% 60.8% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 1/1 8.0 4.0 50.0% 74.4% 53.5% 57.1% 18.2% 64.0% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 5/5 4.2 4.2 52.0% 63.0% 48.2% 44.9% 30.1% 56.2% 38.3% 1991 3/3 7.3 1.3 63.8% 64.9% 49.3% 70.2% 8.3% 59.1% 26.6%
30 1995 2/2 5.0 2.0 56.8% 74.6% 66.3% 80.0% 50.0% 71.2% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Peter Lundgren Danie Visser
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1983 1515 107.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1507 107.7 — — — — +43 — — 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 — +0.01
20 1985 1671 134.7 — — — — +36 — — 58.1% +0.48 4–0 (100%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.03 1982 1483 114.0 — — — — +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) — +1.20
21 1986 1640 129.6 — — — — +37 -156 -99 41.6% -0.36 5–4 (56%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.30 1983 1496 111.4 — — — — +39 -38 — 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.59
22 1987 1837 150.0 — — — — +48 -397 — 58.0% +0.66 7–4 (64%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.26 1984 1618 134.7 — — — — -27 -150 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.82
23 1988 1738 134.2 — — — — +24 — -181 48.5% +0.13 2–4 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19 1985 1643 120.9 — — — — -82 — +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.53
24 1989 1703 123.9 — — — — -64 — +20 47.1% -0.34 1–3 (25%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.44 1986 1676 124.7 — — — — -64 — +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.55
25 1990 1713 139.5 — — — — +23 — -6 46.8% -0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.25 1987 1635 124.7 — — — — -10 — +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) — -1.15
26 1991 1610 134.1 -1.57 -2.37 0.850 47.2% +11 -201 +101 38.8% -0.51 4–6 (40%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.36 1988 1591 112.9 — — — — -2 — +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) — +1.16
27 1992 1580 113.5 -1.29 -1.70 0.876 47.8% +29 — — 37.5% -0.44 3–1 (75%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.85 1989 1621 129.7 — — — — -23 — +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.79
28 1993 1570 104.4 +0.11 -1.94 1.034 49.0% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01 1990 1652 113.0 — — — — -22 — -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.54
29 1994 1534 101.7 -1.08 -1.39 0.875 47.1% +40 — — 25.0% -1.08 1–1 0–1 — +0.11 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 — — 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.02
30 1995 1536 100.9 +2.06 -2.27 1.192 52.6% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — 0–1 — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1868 140.9 -1.27 -2.09 0.872 47.6% +23 -231 -8 46.8% -0.06 32–28 (53%) 34–44 (44%) 99.2 +0.16 — 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.