H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Peter Lundgren vs David Pate H2H: 2-3

David Pate holds a 3–2 lead over Peter Lundgren in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, David Pate leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Peter Lundgren won the 1991 Los Angeles Open round of 32 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Peter Lundgren
SWE Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
David Pate
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Peter Lundgren #59 7-5 6-2 David Pate #112 Match data Aug 1, 1991* R32 Los Angeles Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
David Pate #44 7-5 6-4 Peter Lundgren #59 Match data Sep 29, 1988* R32 San Francisco ATP 250 Carpet
David Pate #32 6-3 6-2 Peter Lundgren #57 Match data Sep 22, 1988* R32 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard
Peter Lundgren #49 3-6 6-1 6-3 David Pate #18 Match data Oct 2, 1987* R16 San Francisco ATP 250 Carpet
David Pate #19 6-4 6-4 Peter Lundgren #49 Match data Sep 25, 1987* R16 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Peter Lundgren #472 #25 619 1,867 119 136 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
David Pate #911 #18 441 1,875 181 168 51.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Peter Lundgren David Pate
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
20 1985 8–4 66.7% #31 1,671 0 1 1982 2–5 28.6% — 1,484 0 0
21 1986 15–22 40.5% #98 1,640 0 1 1983 5–7 41.7% #203 1,529 0 0
22 1987 28–17 62.2% #26 1,837 0 3 1984 21–13 61.8% #30 1,743 0 1
23 1988 20–21 48.8% #66 1,738 0 3 1985 31–24 56.4% #26 1,742 0 1
24 1989 12–14 46.2% #71 1,703 0 3 1986 35–23 60.3% #30 1,788 0 1
25 1990 15–18 45.5% #65 1,713 0 3 1987 28–18 60.9% #18 1,750 0 2
26 1991 13–25 34.2% #138 1,609 0 3 1988 20–16 55.6% #47 1,715 0 2
27 1992 5–8 38.5% #213 1,579 0 3 1989 9–19 32.1% #157 1,656 0 2
28 1993 0–1 0.0% #254 1,569 0 3 1990 16–15 51.6% #94 1,657 0 2
29 1994 1–4 20.0% #386 1,534 0 3 1991 11–18 37.9% #160 1,596 0 2
30 1995 1–1 50.0% #384 1,535 0 3 1992 1–4 20.0% #396 1,573 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1993 1–3 25.0% #514 1,548 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% #624 1,561 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #911 1,542 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Peter Lundgren David Pate
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1983 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1986 9 10 19 47.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 1987 22 10 32 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1984 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1988 16 14 30 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1985 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 7 8 15 46.7%
24 1989 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 1986 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 8 19 57.9%
25 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1987 18 10 28 64.3% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0%
26 1991 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1988 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1992 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 6 14 20 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 1994 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 6 10 16 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 81 73 154 52.6% 1 18 19 5.3% 17 17 34 50.0% 20 28 48 41.7% — 113 98 211 53.6% 5 13 18 27.8% 31 26 57 54.4% 32 31 63 50.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Peter Lundgren David Pate
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1983 1515 107.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1494 104.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — -0.08
20 1985 1671 134.7 — — — — +36 — — 58.1% +0.48 4–0 (100%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.03 1982 1485 108.5 — — — — +40 — — 31.6% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.29
21 1986 1640 129.6 — — — — +37 -156 -99 41.6% -0.36 5–4 (56%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.30 1983 1529 119.4 — — — — +10 — +62 37.9% -0.24 2–1 (67%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.28
22 1987 1837 150.0 — — — — +48 -397 — 58.0% +0.66 7–4 (64%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.26 1984 1744 140.4 — — — — +36 -218 -186 59.5% +0.43 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.33
23 1988 1738 134.2 — — — — +24 — -181 48.5% +0.13 2–4 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19 1985 1743 138.8 — — — — +29 -206 -84 52.4% +0.13 17–9 (65%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.85
24 1989 1703 123.9 — — — — -64 — +20 47.1% -0.34 1–3 (25%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.44 1986 1788 146.3 — — — — +34 — -115 58.3% +0.59 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.85
25 1990 1713 139.5 — — — — +23 — -6 46.8% -0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.25 1987 1751 141.1 — — — — +30 — -55 61.5% +0.54 6–11 (35%) 18–11 (62%) — -0.04
26 1991 1610 134.1 -1.57 -2.37 0.850 47.2% +11 -201 +101 38.8% -0.51 4–6 (40%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.36 1988 1716 139.3 — — — — +41 — -25 52.7% +0.32 7–5 (58%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.56
27 1992 1580 113.5 -1.29 -1.70 0.876 47.8% +29 — — 37.5% -0.44 3–1 (75%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.85 1989 1656 135.9 — — — — +19 — +63 35.5% -1.12 5–5 (50%) 5–8 (38%) — -2.42
28 1993 1570 104.4 +0.11 -1.94 1.034 49.0% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01 1990 1658 127.8 — — — — -22 — +129 50.6% +0.33 6–5 (55%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.85
29 1994 1534 101.7 -1.08 -1.39 0.875 47.1% +40 — — 25.0% -1.08 1–1 0–1 — +0.11 1991 1596 133.2 — — — — +31 -112 +179 40.3% -0.61 5–6 (45%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.86
30 1995 1536 100.9 +2.06 -2.27 1.192 52.6% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — 0–1 — +0.29 1992 1574 104.4 — — — — +24 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.43
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1548 104.3 — — — — +35 — — 33.3% -0.78 0–1 0–2 — +0.22
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1561 100.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -2.20 1–0 — — -0.12
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1542 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.14
Career — 1868 140.9 -1.27 -2.09 0.872 47.6% +23 -231 -8 46.8% -0.06 32–28 (53%) 34–44 (44%) 99.2 +0.16 — 1875 143.1 — — — — +27 -183 -21 50.8% +0.06 62–57 (52%) 73–84 (46%) 98.7 -0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.