H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Peter Lundgren vs Ken Flach H2H: 3-0
Peter Lundgren holds a 3–0 lead over Ken Flach in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Peter Lundgren leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Peter Lundgren won the 1992 Washington second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 1992* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Peter Lundgren | 7-5 6-2 | Ken Flach | Match data |
| Jul 2, 1989* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Peter Lundgren | 6-3 6-2 6-7 6-3 | Ken Flach | Match data |
| Aug 4, 1988* | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Peter Lundgren | 6-1 6-4 | Ken Flach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Lundgren | #472 | #25 | 619 | 1,867 | 119 | 136 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ken Flach | #815 | #56 | 130 | 1,714 | 52 | 80 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Peter Lundgren | Ken Flach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #31 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #314 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #98 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #155 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #223 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #71 | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #100 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,711 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #203 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #138 | 1,608 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #213 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,566 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #572 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #386 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #384 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #514 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |