H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Peter Lundgren vs Matt Mitchell H2H: 1-0
Peter Lundgren holds a 1–0 lead over Matt Mitchell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Lundgren leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Peter Lundgren won the 1986 Rotterdam third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 69
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 1986* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Peter Lundgren | 7-5 6-1 | Matt Mitchell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Lundgren | #472 | #25 | 619 | 1,867 | 119 | 136 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Matt Mitchell | #920 | #53 | 0 | 1,717 | 60 | 103 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Peter Lundgren | Matt Mitchell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #31 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #196 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #98 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #239 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #71 | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,711 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #96 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #138 | 1,608 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #85 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #213 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,566 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #386 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #799 | 1,501 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #384 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |