H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Peter Lundgren vs Peter Doohan H2H: 1-0
Peter Lundgren holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Doohan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Lundgren leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Lundgren won the 1988 Key Biscayne first round 7-5 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1988* | Key Biscayne | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Peter Lundgren | 7-5 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Peter Doohan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Lundgren | #472 | #25 | 619 | 1,867 | 119 | 136 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Peter Doohan | #1,102 | #43 | 140 | 1,737 | 50 | 82 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Peter Lundgren | Peter Doohan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #31 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #98 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #85 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #71 | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #101 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,711 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #138 | 1,608 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #213 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,566 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #386 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,435 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #384 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1131 | 1,427 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 |