H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Peter Wessels vs George Bastl H2H: 0-1

George Bastl holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Wessels in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, George Bastl leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, George Bastl won the 1999 Tashkent semifinal 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Peter Wessels
NED Age 48 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
George Bastl
SUI Age 51 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
George Bastl #154 6-4 6-3 Peter Wessels #92 Match data Sep 18, 1999* SF Tashkent ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Peter Wessels #987 #72 586 1,714 43 58 42.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
George Bastl #953 #71 569 1,656 47 85 35.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Peter Wessels George Bastl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 0–3 0.0% #369 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 0–2 0.0% #321 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1998 1–2 33.3% #112 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1999 12–15 44.4% #108 1,591 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,495 0 0
22 2000 7–5 58.3% #150 1,641 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2001 11–11 50.0% #110 1,604 0 1 1998 1–3 25.0% #194 1,501 0 0
24 2002 0–1 0.0% #465 1,564 0 1 1999 6–7 46.2% #81 1,558 0 0
25 2003 0–1 0.0% #203 1,557 0 1 2000 15–22 40.5% #105 1,611 0 0
26 2004 0–2 0.0% #89 1,526 0 1 2001 10–15 40.0% #115 1,622 0 0
27 2005 8–13 38.1% #144 1,563 0 1 2002 3–9 25.0% #160 1,564 0 0
28 2006 0–1 0.0% #401 1,527 0 1 2003 0–3 0.0% #277 1,499 0 0
29 2007 4–2 66.7% #163 1,613 0 1 2004 0–1 0.0% #201 1,490 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2005 4–7 36.4% #128 1,564 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2006 5–8 38.5% #173 1,588 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2007 1–4 20.0% #464 1,522 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2008 1–4 20.0% #233 1,619 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2009 1–1 50.0% #523 1,473 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Peter Wessels George Bastl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2000 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 11 13 24 45.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2004 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 8 9 17 47.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2005 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 23 32 55 41.8% 2 7 9 22.2% 18 14 32 56.2% 0 5 5 0.0% — 37 51 88 42.0% 2 12 14 14.3% 3 13 16 18.8% 5 9 14 35.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 95/101 of Peter Wessels's and 122/132 of George Bastl's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Peter Wessels George Bastl
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 3/3 8.3 3.0 61.5% 62.5% 32.4% 55.7% 61.1% 51.3% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 2/2 10.0 2.0 60.1% 73.6% 38.5% 58.5% 0.0% 59.6% 17.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 1/3 12.0 4.0 61.3% 66.2% 53.5% 66.7% 100.0% 61.3% 21.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 27/27 9.5 4.6 61.2% 75.2% 49.1% 61.8% 39.6% 65.1% 33.9% 1996 1/1 4.0 2.0 65.0% 67.3% 53.6% 50.0% 33.3% 62.5% 26.9%
22 2000 11/12 10.4 2.3 66.2% 73.9% 57.2% 52.5% 42.9% 68.6% 31.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 19/22 9.0 3.5 59.8% 74.1% 53.4% 63.5% 51.5% 65.9% 34.5% 1998 3/4 4.0 3.3 72.6% 63.1% 43.7% 47.1% 30.0% 57.6% 33.1%
24 2002 1/1 4.0 9.0 57.5% 67.4% 44.1% 72.7% 50.0% 57.5% 30.6% 1999 11/13 5.1 3.2 63.5% 68.4% 48.1% 57.2% 41.1% 61.1% 37.7%
25 2003 1/1 4.0 4.0 47.4% 59.3% 33.3% 64.3% 50.0% 45.6% 31.1% 2000 32/37 3.8 2.8 66.2% 63.9% 48.5% 58.5% 37.4% 58.6% 39.3%
26 2004 2/2 4.0 3.0 67.0% 63.1% 28.0% 43.7% 25.0% 51.4% 34.9% 2001 23/25 6.3 1.9 69.0% 64.5% 49.6% 50.3% 44.1% 60.2% 38.5%
27 2005 21/21 8.0 2.5 65.9% 72.9% 49.9% 59.9% 30.0% 64.9% 32.2% 2002 12/12 5.8 5.0 62.9% 67.2% 44.2% 58.8% 27.8% 58.5% 32.7%
28 2006 1/1 3.0 3.0 55.4% 54.8% 28.0% 40.0% 60.0% 42.9% 37.7% 2003 3/3 1.0 1.7 67.6% 64.9% 46.2% 47.8% 33.3% 59.0% 26.5%
29 2007 6/6 12.0 2.7 65.6% 83.8% 56.3% 79.2% 46.6% 74.5% 34.8% 2004 1/1 8.0 2.0 69.4% 71.2% 42.3% 71.4% 50.0% 62.4% 31.9%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 11/11 5.9 3.0 59.7% 62.9% 47.8% 59.8% 46.0% 58.4% 36.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 13/13 6.9 3.5 57.3% 71.7% 44.5% 56.0% 30.4% 60.1% 34.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 5/5 6.0 3.0 65.7% 71.4% 40.6% 51.0% 15.5% 60.7% 33.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 5/5 5.8 2.6 63.6% 65.8% 50.9% 58.0% 31.2% 60.6% 29.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 5.5 4.5 52.3% 69.4% 41.4% 31.0% 49.1% 56.0% 42.4%
Career — 95/101 9.0 3.4 62.7% 73.6% 49.9% 61.0% 41.3% 64.8% 33.0% — 122/132 5.3 3.0 64.5% 66.1% 47.2% 55.4% 36.9% 59.4% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Peter Wessels George Bastl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1475 102.0 -0.08 -2.50 0.713 43.5% — — — 0.0% -2.83 — — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1467 105.2 -1.39 +2.61 0.437 40.9% — — — 0.0% -3.40 — — — -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 1480 109.1 +1.72 +5.01 0.543 44.9% — — — 42.9% -0.28 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 1591 118.8 +2.37 -3.00 0.971 49.5% +12 — -32 45.3% -0.21 6–6 (50%) 8–10 (44%) — +1.84 1996 1495 106.7 -1.02 +6.41 0.716 46.3% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.15
22 2000 1641 122.2 +2.17 -2.35 1.006 50.2% -75 — +51 54.2% +0.17 2–0 3–3 (50%) — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 1605 120.2 +2.47 -1.70 1.013 50.4% -16 — +82 50.0% +0.06 2–3 (40%) 7–3 (70%) — +0.81 1998 1502 110.8 -1.46 +0.40 0.781 46.0% — — — 30.0% -0.90 1–1 1–0 — -0.32
24 2002 1564 101.9 +1.56 -0.70 0.721 45.8% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.13 1999 1559 129.2 -0.33 +1.04 0.969 49.6% +50 — — 50.0% -0.03 0–2 3–2 (60%) — +0.94
25 2003 1557 102.3 -0.62 +1.54 0.572 39.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10 2000 1611 132.3 -2.50 +1.37 0.949 49.0% +51 -110 -122 40.7% -0.52 6–4 (60%) 3–9 (25%) — -0.59
26 2004 1527 100.6 -2.69 -2.56 0.718 43.4% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.05 2001 1622 126.7 -1.08 +0.30 0.967 49.3% +92 -173 — 41.7% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 8–6 (57%) — -0.23
27 2005 1564 122.2 +1.32 -2.48 0.918 48.4% -13 -82 — 44.4% -0.24 1–4 (20%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.36 2002 1564 112.2 -2.22 -2.35 0.786 45.8% +54 — -26 31.3% -1.19 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.20
28 2006 1528 99.1 -2.36 -1.00 0.660 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.05 2003 1500 93.7 -3.02 +0.52 0.647 43.0% — — — 0.0% -2.83 — — — +0.05
29 2007 1613 113.3 +3.68 -0.01 1.362 53.2% — — +120 71.4% +0.93 0–2 4–3 (57%) — +0.38 2004 1491 102.5 -1.47 +0.15 0.847 48.7% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.12
30 2008 1574 105.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1564 113.3 -2.00 -0.81 0.880 47.3% +41 — — 37.0% -0.96 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.35
31 2009 1554 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1589 118.6 -2.70 -0.72 0.853 47.5% +30 — -49 35.7% -0.89 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.07
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1523 107.1 -2.47 -1.23 0.863 47.0% +43 — — 30.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.26
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1619 114.2 -0.33 -1.38 0.737 45.5% +36 — — 25.0% -1.42 1–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.03
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1473 105.8 -1.01 +0.84 0.965 48.7% — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 — — -0.06
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1426 93.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1402 95.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1386 94.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1375 96.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1714 121.4 +1.86 -2.04 0.937 49.0% -10 -82 +56 44.8% -0.29 11–17 (39%) 27–31 (47%) 99.5 +2.81 — 1656 119.8 -1.84 +0.11 0.895 48.0% +55 -135 -62 37.8% -0.72 16–22 (42%) 22–31 (42%) 95.6 +0.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.