H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Peter Wessels vs Tomas Zib H2H: 1-0
Peter Wessels holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Zib in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Wessels leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Peter Wessels won the 2001 Newport third round 7-6(5) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 48
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2001* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Peter Wessels | 7-6(5) 6-1 | Tomas Zib | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Wessels | #987 | #72 | 586 | 1,715 | 43 | 58 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tomas Zib | #1,339 | #51 | 688 | 1,636 | 41 | 94 | 30.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Peter Wessels | Tomas Zib | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #369 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #108 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #150 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #117 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #89 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #144 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #401 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #121 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #163 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–20 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |