H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Peter Wessels vs Wayne Arthurs H2H: 2-1
Peter Wessels holds a 2–1 lead over Wayne Arthurs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Peter Wessels leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Peter Wessels won the 2005 Beijing third round 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 48
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2005* | Beijing | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Peter Wessels | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
| Oct 25, 2001* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Wayne Arthurs | 6-3 6-4 | Peter Wessels | Match data |
| Jul 15, 2000* | Newport | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Peter Wessels | 7-6(6) 6-7(7) 6-4 | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Wessels | #987 | #72 | 586 | 1,715 | 43 | 58 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Wayne Arthurs | #368 | #44 | 833 | 1,781 | 122 | 152 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Peter Wessels | Wayne Arthurs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #369 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #108 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #150 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #561 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #89 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #144 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #187 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #401 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #105 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #163 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #83 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #161 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #244 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |