H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Peter Wessels vs Wayne Arthurs H2H: 2-1

Peter Wessels holds a 2–1 lead over Wayne Arthurs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Peter Wessels leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Peter Wessels won the 2005 China Open round of 32 7-6(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Peter Wessels
NED Age 48 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Wayne Arthurs
AUS Age 55 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Peter Wessels #115 7-6(5) 6-4 Wayne Arthurs #98 Match data Sep 15, 2005* R32 China Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Wayne Arthurs #82 6-3 6-4 Peter Wessels #128 Match data Oct 25, 2001* R32 Stockholm Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Peter Wessels #133 7-6(6) 6-7(7) 6-4 Wayne Arthurs #154 Match data Jul 15, 2000* SF Newport ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Peter Wessels #987 #72 586 1,714 43 58 42.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Wayne Arthurs #368 #44 833 1,781 123 153 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Peter Wessels Wayne Arthurs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 0–3 0.0% #369 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 0–2 0.0% #321 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1998 1–2 33.3% #112 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1999 12–15 44.4% #108 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2000 7–5 58.3% #150 1,641 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2001 11–11 50.0% #110 1,604 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2002 0–1 0.0% #465 1,564 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 2003 0–1 0.0% #203 1,557 0 1 1996 1–2 33.3% #561 1,499 0 0
26 2004 0–2 0.0% #89 1,526 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2005 8–13 38.1% #144 1,563 0 1 1998 4–3 57.1% #187 1,568 0 0
28 2006 0–1 0.0% #401 1,527 0 1 1999 12–11 52.2% #105 1,651 0 0
29 2007 4–2 66.7% #163 1,613 0 1 2000 13–18 41.9% #83 1,700 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2001 19–23 45.2% #77 1,637 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2002 23–24 48.9% #52 1,701 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2003 11–22 33.3% #117 1,612 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2004 13–20 39.4% #101 1,557 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2005 17–18 48.6% #97 1,621 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2006 6–10 37.5% #161 1,625 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2007 4–2 66.7% #244 1,667 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Peter Wessels Wayne Arthurs
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2004 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
28 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
29 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2000 9 10 19 47.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 10 15 25 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 8 14 22 36.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 7 11 18 38.9% 1 8 9 11.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 11 14 25 44.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 23 32 55 41.8% 2 7 9 22.2% 18 14 32 56.2% 0 5 5 0.0% — 68 91 159 42.8% 18 31 49 36.7% 34 27 61 55.7% 3 4 7 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 95/101 of Peter Wessels's and 246/276 of Wayne Arthurs's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Peter Wessels Wayne Arthurs
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 3/3 8.3 3.0 61.5% 62.5% 32.4% 55.7% 61.1% 51.3% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 2/2 10.0 2.0 60.1% 73.6% 38.5% 58.5% 0.0% 59.6% 17.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 1/3 12.0 4.0 61.3% 66.2% 53.5% 66.7% 100.0% 61.3% 21.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 27/27 9.5 4.6 61.2% 75.2% 49.1% 61.8% 39.6% 65.1% 33.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 11/12 10.4 2.3 66.2% 73.9% 57.2% 52.5% 42.9% 68.6% 31.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 19/22 9.0 3.5 59.8% 74.1% 53.4% 63.5% 51.5% 65.9% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2002 1/1 4.0 9.0 57.5% 67.4% 44.1% 72.7% 50.0% 57.5% 30.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 1/1 4.0 4.0 47.4% 59.3% 33.3% 64.3% 50.0% 45.6% 31.1% 1996 2/3 7.5 3.5 49.9% 77.4% 60.4% 85.7% 12.5% 68.9% 34.5%
26 2004 2/2 4.0 3.0 67.0% 63.1% 28.0% 43.7% 25.0% 51.4% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 21/21 8.0 2.5 65.9% 72.9% 49.9% 59.9% 30.0% 64.9% 32.2% 1998 6/7 18.2 6.0 53.2% 85.4% 55.7% 85.1% 29.4% 71.8% 31.2%
28 2006 1/1 3.0 3.0 55.4% 54.8% 28.0% 40.0% 60.0% 42.9% 37.7% 1999 21/23 17.0 4.1 56.2% 83.6% 58.5% 69.9% 26.0% 72.5% 29.2%
29 2007 6/6 12.0 2.7 65.6% 83.8% 56.3% 79.2% 46.6% 74.5% 34.8% 2000 22/31 15.3 6.6 53.1% 79.6% 56.9% 65.9% 32.0% 69.0% 27.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 37/42 15.4 5.2 53.2% 81.3% 56.6% 67.2% 41.3% 69.8% 31.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 38/47 16.4 5.3 58.2% 81.0% 53.9% 72.7% 30.8% 69.7% 31.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 33/33 14.6 4.6 57.5% 78.5% 53.1% 61.1% 28.5% 67.6% 26.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 30/33 14.8 5.5 56.2% 77.6% 53.2% 72.0% 35.2% 66.6% 29.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 35/35 15.2 5.1 55.3% 82.1% 55.4% 65.2% 24.4% 70.2% 30.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 16/16 19.3 4.8 56.9% 81.0% 53.9% 61.1% 31.8% 69.4% 28.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 6/6 18.3 5.8 59.3% 69.2% 46.3% 60.5% 33.6% 60.3% 27.2%
Career — 95/101 9.0 3.4 62.7% 73.6% 49.9% 61.0% 41.3% 64.8% 33.0% — 246/276 15.8 5.2 55.8% 80.3% 54.9% 67.7% 31.3% 69.1% 29.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Peter Wessels Wayne Arthurs
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1475 102.0 -0.08 -2.50 0.713 43.5% — — — 0.0% -2.83 — — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1467 105.2 -1.39 +2.61 0.437 40.9% — — — 0.0% -3.40 — — — -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 1480 109.1 +1.72 +5.01 0.543 44.9% — — — 42.9% -0.28 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 1591 118.8 +2.37 -3.00 0.971 49.5% +12 — -32 45.3% -0.21 6–6 (50%) 8–10 (44%) — +1.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 1641 122.2 +2.17 -2.35 1.006 50.2% -75 — +51 54.2% +0.17 2–0 3–3 (50%) — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 1605 120.2 +2.47 -1.70 1.013 50.4% -16 — +82 50.0% +0.06 2–3 (40%) 7–3 (70%) — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2002 1564 101.9 +1.56 -0.70 0.721 45.8% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 1557 102.3 -0.62 +1.54 0.572 39.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10 1996 1500 104.7 -0.05 -0.39 1.112 51.2% — — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.13
26 2004 1527 100.6 -2.69 -2.56 0.718 43.4% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 1564 122.2 +1.32 -2.48 0.918 48.4% -13 -82 — 44.4% -0.24 1–4 (20%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.36 1998 1568 120.7 +4.91 -3.72 1.108 51.8% +19 -8 — 52.6% 0.00 1–1 4–3 (57%) — -0.21
28 2006 1528 99.1 -2.36 -1.00 0.660 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.05 1999 1652 125.2 +6.73 -4.44 1.062 50.8% -84 — +63 53.1% 0.00 3–3 (50%) 15–11 (58%) — +0.57
29 2007 1613 113.3 +3.68 -0.01 1.362 53.2% — — +120 71.4% +0.93 0–2 4–3 (57%) — +0.38 2000 1700 134.3 +4.47 -5.48 0.877 48.7% -6 -214 +1 45.1% -0.21 2–5 (29%) 13–13 (50%) — -0.74
30 2008 1574 105.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1637 134.5 +6.51 -3.67 1.047 50.8% -26 -53 +51 49.1% +0.21 7–9 (44%) 13–22 (37%) — -0.69
31 2009 1554 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1701 132.5 +5.52 -5.12 1.021 50.5% -74 -103 +52 48.0% -0.03 12–9 (57%) 19–23 (45%) — +0.07
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1612 126.7 +4.04 -7.94 0.817 47.1% +12 -96 +126 37.8% -0.76 5–4 (56%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.96
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1557 126.0 +1.95 -5.15 0.873 48.5% +46 -38 +71 41.7% -0.36 4–8 (33%) 11–17 (39%) — +0.89
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1621 128.8 +5.90 -5.67 1.006 49.9% +11 -77 +14 46.6% -0.06 7–5 (58%) 13–18 (42%) — +0.19
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1625 120.7 +3.77 -4.98 0.940 49.0% -21 — +42 39.5% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.02
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1668 109.1 -1.63 -3.62 0.685 44.3% -80 — +91 60.0% +0.45 2–0 3–4 (43%) — +0.58
Career — 1714 121.4 +1.86 -2.04 0.937 49.0% -10 -82 +56 44.8% -0.29 11–17 (39%) 27–31 (47%) 99.5 +2.81 — 1781 134.2 +4.75 -5.22 0.952 49.4% -13 -84 +54 46.1% -0.16 46–48 (49%) 109–134 (45%) 100.5 -0.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.