H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Phil Lehnhoff vs Mike De Palmer H2H: 0-1

Mike De Palmer holds a 1–0 lead over Phil Lehnhoff in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mike De Palmer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mike De Palmer won the 1983 Queen's Club Championships round of 64 6-2 6-1.

USA Age 65 Right-Handed
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mike De Palmer 6-2 6-1 Phil Lehnhoff Match data Jun 8, 1983* R64 Queen's Club Championships ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Phil Lehnhoff #786 #182 0 1,509 2 5 28.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mike De Palmer 1,752 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Phil Lehnhoff Mike De Palmer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,495 0 0
21 1982 1–1 50.0% 1,506 0 0
22 1983 0–2 0.0% #423 1,489 0 0
23 1984 1–1 50.0% #344 1,497 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Phil Lehnhoff Mike De Palmer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1982 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 4 10 60.0%
22 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 6 10 16 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1986 5 5 10 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1987 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 34 39 73 46.6% 10 12 22 45.5% 12 15 27 44.4% 12 11 23 52.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Phil Lehnhoff Mike De Palmer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1980 1495 103.6 0.0% -2.50 -0.03 1981 1497 107.5 0.0% -3.00 -0.19
20 1982 1622 119.9 +40 -44 54.1% -0.10 8–4 (67%) 10–3 (77%) 111.2 +2.64
21 1982 1506 107.8 40.0% 0.00 1–0 +0.15 1983 1582 134.9 +90 -20 -9 49.5% -0.08 6–9 (40%) 7–8 (47%) 99.6 +0.81
22 1983 1490 96.9 0.0% -3.00 0–1 -0.11 1984 1636 127.4 +76 54.2% 0.00 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.7 +1.07
23 1984 1498 101.1 50.0% +0.25 +0.17 1985 1714 138.4 -69 -101 -3 50.0% -0.08 6–8 (43%) 8–7 (53%) 99.8 -1.39
24 1986 1674 121.3 -14 -49 40.8% -0.75 3–2 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 102.2 -0.63
25 1987 1589 116.5 -4 35.1% -0.97 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.4 -0.70
Career 1510 104.0 26.7% -1.07 1–0 0–1 +2.57 1752 135.1 +28 -50 -18 48.1% -0.26 26–29 (47%) 37–25 (60%) 108.0 +1.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.