H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Philipp Kohlschreiber vs Denis Istomin H2H: 1-5

Denis Istomin holds a 5–1 lead over Philipp Kohlschreiber in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Denis Istomin leads 2–1 on clay and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Denis Istomin won the 2018 Kitzbuhel fourth round 5-7 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Philipp Kohlschreiber
GER Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
Denis Istomin
UZB Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 20, 2021 Metz ATP 250 Q1 Q Hard Philipp Kohlschreiber #107 7-5 6-3 Denis Istomin #225 Match data
Aug 2, 2018* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R16 Clay Denis Istomin #95 5-7 6-3 6-1 Philipp Kohlschreiber #29 Match data
Jun 14, 2018* Stuttgart ATP 250 R32 Grass Denis Istomin #100 7-6(2) 7-6(3) Philipp Kohlschreiber #22 Match data
May 29, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Philipp Kohlschreiber #24 6-3 7-6(5) 6-2 Denis Istomin #49 Match data
May 1, 2014* Munich ATP 250 R32 Clay Denis Istomin #55 7-5 2-6 6-4 Philipp Kohlschreiber #26 Match data
Jun 22, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Denis Istomin #65 4-6 6-3 6-3 6-3 Philipp Kohlschreiber #39 Match data
Feb 13, 2010* San Jose ATP 250 QF Hard Denis Istomin #96 6-1 1-6 6-3 Philipp Kohlschreiber #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Philipp Kohlschreiber #779 #16 2,160 2,054 444 372 54.4% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Denis Istomin #1,509 #33 1,217 1,900 191 245 43.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Philipp Kohlschreiber Denis Istomin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #247 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 1–3 25.0% #208 1,541 0 0 2006 0–2 0.0% #200 1,474 0 0
20 2004 6–10 37.5% #88 1,562 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2005 12–25 32.4% #86 1,538 0 0 2008 2–2 50.0% #105 1,559 0 0
22 2006 23–20 53.5% #62 1,653 0 0 2009 13–17 43.3% #102 1,636 0 0
23 2007 30–23 56.6% #32 1,767 0 1 2010 29–29 50.0% #40 1,767 0 0
24 2008 29–19 60.4% #28 1,857 0 2 2011 10–21 32.3% #73 1,665 0 0
25 2009 34–26 56.7% #27 1,833 0 2 2012 26–29 47.3% #43 1,732 0 0
26 2010 34–24 58.6% #34 1,851 0 2 2013 30–29 50.8% #45 1,808 0 0
27 2011 28–22 56.0% #43 1,848 0 3 2014 24–23 51.1% #49 1,853 0 0
28 2012 40–24 62.5% #20 1,888 0 4 2015 20–23 46.5% #61 1,788 0 1
29 2013 33–24 57.9% #22 1,937 0 4 2016 6–19 24.0% #121 1,711 0 1
30 2014 32–25 56.1% #24 1,899 0 4 2017 15–18 45.5% #63 1,724 0 2
31 2015 30–22 57.7% #34 1,972 0 5 2018 12–18 40.0% #92 1,679 0 2
32 2016 29–22 56.9% #32 1,874 0 6 2019 3–11 21.4% #177 1,567 0 2
33 2017 32–20 61.5% #29 1,957 0 7 2020 0–1 0.0% #184 1,545 0 2
34 2018 24–22 52.2% #34 1,886 0 7 2021 0–2 0.0% #254 1,545 0 2
35 2019 17–21 44.7% #79 1,787 0 7 2022 1–1 50.0% #467 1,577 0 2
36 2020 2–7 22.2% #98 1,725 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2021 7–8 46.7% #114 1,717 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #416 1,662 0 7 — — — — — — —