H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Philipp Kohlschreiber vs Ivo Karlovic H2H: 3-2

Philipp Kohlschreiber holds a 3–2 lead over Ivo Karlovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Ivo Karlovic leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Philipp Kohlschreiber leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Philipp Kohlschreiber won the 2018 Munich third round 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Philipp Kohlschreiber
GER Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 11, 2019* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 Q2 Q Hard Ivo Karlovic #81 7-6(4) 6-7(1) 6-4 Philipp Kohlschreiber #73 Match data
May 3, 2018* Munich ATP 250 R32 Clay Philipp Kohlschreiber #34 7-5 6-4 Ivo Karlovic #82 Match data
Jun 17, 2016* Halle ATP 500 R16 Grass Philipp Kohlschreiber #25 6-7(7) 6-4 7-5 Ivo Karlovic #28 Match data
Jan 6, 2011* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard Ivo Karlovic #73 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 7-6(2) Philipp Kohlschreiber #34 Match data
Oct 8, 2009* Beijing ATP 500 R32 Hard Philipp Kohlschreiber #22 7-6(6) 4-6 6-1 Ivo Karlovic #30 Match data
Aug 2, 2008* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Ivo Karlovic #22 7-6(6) 7-6(3) Philipp Kohlschreiber #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Philipp Kohlschreiber #779 #16 2,160 2,054 444 372 54.4% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,998 357 333 51.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Philipp Kohlschreiber Ivo Karlovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #247 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 1–3 25.0% #208 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 6–10 37.5% #88 1,562 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2005 12–25 32.4% #86 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2006 23–20 53.5% #62 1,653 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0
23 2007 30–23 56.6% #32 1,767 0 1 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0
24 2008 29–19 60.4% #28 1,857 0 2 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,666 0 0
25 2009 34–26 56.7% #27 1,833 0 2 2004 16–24 40.0% #61 1,667 0 0
26 2010 34–24 58.6% #34 1,851 0 2 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,739 0 0
27 2011 28–22 56.0% #43 1,848 0 3 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,632 0 0
28 2012 40–24 62.5% #20 1,888 0 4 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,940 0 3
29 2013 33–24 57.9% #22 1,937 0 4 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,815 0 4
30 2014 32–25 56.1% #24 1,899 0 4 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,795 0 4
31 2015 30–22 57.7% #34 1,972 0 5 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,864 0 4
32 2016 29–22 56.9% #32 1,874 0 6 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,819 0 4
33 2017 32–20 61.5% #29 1,957 0 7 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,768 0 4
34 2018 24–22 52.2% #34 1,886 0 7 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,772 0 5
35 2019 17–21 44.7% #79 1,787 0 7 2014 32–27 54.2% #27 1,853 0 5
36 2020 2–7 22.2% #98 1,725 0 7 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,916 0 6
37 2021 7–8 46.7% #114 1,717 0 7 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,970 0 8
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #416 1,662 0 7 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,770 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,644 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,668 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,615 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,623 0 8