H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Philipp Kohlschreiber vs Janko Tipsarevic H2H: 1-2
Janko Tipsarevic holds a 2–1 lead over Philipp Kohlschreiber in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Janko Tipsarevic leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Janko Tipsarevic won the 2016 Shanghai Masters second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2016* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Janko Tipsarevic | 6-2 6-4 | Philipp Kohlschreiber | Match data |
| Sep 4, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Janko Tipsarevic | 6-3 7-6(5) 6-2 | Philipp Kohlschreiber | Match data |
| Aug 11, 2010* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Philipp Kohlschreiber | 2-2 (ret.) | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philipp Kohlschreiber | #779 | #16 | 2,160 | 2,054 | 444 | 372 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Janko Tipsarevic | #755 | #8 | 3,320 | 2,072 | 245 | 240 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Philipp Kohlschreiber | Janko Tipsarevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #117 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 12–25 | 32.4% | #86 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #139 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #62 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #32 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #28 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #49 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #27 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #34 | 1,851 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #43 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #9 | 2,006 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2012 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 48–26 | 64.9% | #9 | 1,972 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2013 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #22 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2014 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #24 | 1,899 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #34 | 1,972 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #410 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2016 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #32 | 1,874 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #144 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2017 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #29 | 1,957 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #105 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2018 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,886 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,787 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #219 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 2020 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #98 | 1,725 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #114 | 1,717 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #416 | 1,662 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |