H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Philipp Kohlschreiber vs Jarkko Nieminen H2H: 2-5

Jarkko Nieminen holds a 5–2 lead over Philipp Kohlschreiber in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Philipp Kohlschreiber leads 2–1 on clay, while Jarkko Nieminen leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2008 Australian Open fourth round 3-6 7-6(7) 7-6(9) 6-3.

GER Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 5
7 main draw meetings
FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 22, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #26 3-6 7-6(7) 7-6(9) 6-3 Philipp Kohlschreiber #27 Match data
May 4, 2007* Munich ATP 250 R16 Clay Philipp Kohlschreiber #49 6-1 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #21 Match data
Jul 28, 2006* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R16 Clay Philipp Kohlschreiber #65 6-2 4-6 6-3 Jarkko Nieminen #15 Match data
Jul 2, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Jarkko Nieminen #18 1-6 6-2 6-3 7-6(4) Philipp Kohlschreiber #88 Match data
Jun 15, 2006* Halle ATP 250 R32 Grass Jarkko Nieminen #18 7-6(3) 6-4 Philipp Kohlschreiber #87 Match data
Apr 27, 2006* Barcelona ATP 250 R32 Clay Jarkko Nieminen #20 6-1 6-2 Philipp Kohlschreiber #86 Match data
Mar 9, 2006* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #24 6-1 3-6 6-3 Philipp Kohlschreiber #94 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Philipp Kohlschreiber #779 #16 2,160 2,054 444 372 54.4% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Philipp Kohlschreiber Jarkko Nieminen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #247 1,493 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0
19 2003 1–3 25.0% #208 1,541 0 0 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0
20 2004 6–10 37.5% #88 1,562 0 0 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0
21 2005 12–25 32.4% #86 1,538 0 0 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0
22 2006 23–20 53.5% #62 1,653 0 0 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0
23 2007 30–23 56.6% #32 1,767 0 1 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0
24 2008 29–19 60.4% #28 1,857 0 2 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1
25 2009 34–26 56.7% #27 1,833 0 2 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1
26 2010 34–24 58.6% #34 1,851 0 2 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1
27 2011 28–22 56.0% #43 1,848 0 3 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1
28 2012 40–24 62.5% #20 1,888 0 4 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1
29 2013 33–24 57.9% #22 1,937 0 4 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1
30 2014 32–25 56.1% #24 1,899 0 4 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2
31 2015 30–22 57.7% #34 1,972 0 5 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2
32 2016 29–22 56.9% #32 1,874 0 6 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2
33 2017 32–20 61.5% #29 1,957 0 7 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2
34 2018 24–22 52.2% #34 1,886 0 7
35 2019 17–21 44.7% #79 1,787 0 7
36 2020 2–7 22.2% #98 1,725 0 7
37 2021 7–8 46.7% #114 1,717 0 7
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #416 1,662 0 7