H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Philipp Kohlschreiber vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 2-2

Philipp Kohlschreiber and Lleyton Hewitt are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Philipp Kohlschreiber won the 2011 Halle Open quarterfinal 7-6(4) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Philipp Kohlschreiber
GER Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Philipp Kohlschreiber #49 7-6(4) 6-3 Lleyton Hewitt #73 Match data Jun 11, 2011* QF Halle Open ATP 250 Grass
Lleyton Hewitt #10 6-2 6-0 Philipp Kohlschreiber #102 Match data Mar 4, 2006* QF Las Vegas ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Philipp Kohlschreiber #86 6-3 0-6 7-5 Lleyton Hewitt #4 Match data Jan 6, 2006* R16 Adelaide International ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Lleyton Hewitt #1 7-5 6-4 Philipp Kohlschreiber #426 Match data May 15, 2002* R64 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Philipp Kohlschreiber #779 #16 2,160 2,047 449 375 54.5% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,160 567 244 69.9% 2 2 2 2 22 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Philipp Kohlschreiber Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,615 0 1
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #247 1,493 0 0 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,854 0 2
19 2003 1–3 25.0% #208 1,541 0 0 2000 53–16 76.8% #7 1,980 0 6
20 2004 6–10 37.5% #88 1,563 0 0 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 2005 12–25 32.4% #86 1,539 0 0 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,066 2 17
22 2006 23–20 53.5% #62 1,666 0 0 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 2007 30–23 56.6% #32 1,770 0 1 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,073 2 23
24 2008 29–19 60.4% #28 1,844 0 2 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,114 2 24
25 2009 34–26 56.7% #27 1,835 0 2 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,971 2 25
26 2010 34–24 58.6% #34 1,867 0 2 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,919 2 26
27 2011 28–22 56.0% #43 1,851 0 3 2008 18–11 62.1% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2012 40–24 62.5% #20 1,893 0 4 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,959 2 27
29 2013 33–25 56.9% #22 1,927 0 4 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,909 2 28
30 2014 36–25 59.0% #24 1,911 0 5 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,818 2 28
31 2015 30–22 57.7% #34 1,952 0 6 2012 15–12 55.6% #83 1,884 2 28
32 2016 30–23 56.6% #32 1,882 0 7 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,889 2 28
33 2017 32–20 61.5% #29 1,983 0 8 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 2018 24–22 52.2% #34 1,889 0 8 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,714 2 30
35 2019 17–21 44.7% #79 1,788 0 8 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30
36 2020 2–7 22.2% #98 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
37 2021 7–9 43.8% #114 1,716 0 8 — — — — — — —
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #416 1,662 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Philipp Kohlschreiber Lleyton Hewitt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
18 2002 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 20 10 30 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
19 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2000 37 11 48 77.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 2004 4 5 9 44.4% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 2001 48 10 58 82.8% 10 3 13 76.9% 13 1 14 92.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2005 6 10 16 37.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 2002 33 9 42 78.6% 10 5 15 66.7% 14 1 15 93.3% 4 1 5 80.0%
22 2006 7 6 13 53.8% 9 9 18 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 2003 23 6 29 79.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2007 12 13 25 48.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 44 9 53 83.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2008 22 13 35 62.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2005 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
25 2009 19 16 35 54.3% 10 8 18 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2006 20 11 31 64.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — —
26 2010 21 15 36 58.3% 9 7 16 56.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2007 21 9 30 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
27 2011 16 15 31 51.6% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2008 10 8 18 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
28 2012 20 15 35 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2009 18 14 32 56.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 2013 15 14 29 51.7% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2010 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
30 2014 17 14 31 54.8% 15 9 24 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2011 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 2015 11 11 22 50.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2012 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
32 2016 13 13 26 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2013 13 12 25 52.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
33 2017 17 11 28 60.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2014 11 9 20 55.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
34 2018 11 11 22 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
35 2019 8 10 18 44.4% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2016 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 224 203 427 52.5% 160 125 285 56.1% 60 41 101 59.4% 5 6 11 45.5% — 357 157 514 69.5% 79 43 122 64.8% 114 37 151 75.5% 17 7 24 70.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 806/824 of Philipp Kohlschreiber's and 753/811 of Lleyton Hewitt's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Philipp Kohlschreiber Lleyton Hewitt
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 1/1 4.0 3.0 55.6% 56.7% 43.8% 58.8% 50.0% 50.9% 30.8%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 18/19 2.8 4.1 54.8% 68.2% 51.4% 54.4% 39.1% 60.4% 40.6%
18 2002 2/2 7.0 3.0 46.3% 67.5% 46.4% 64.4% 40.0% 56.1% 36.5% 1999 51/58 3.9 2.2 59.1% 71.5% 56.2% 61.1% 49.8% 65.1% 42.8%
19 2003 4/4 3.5 2.3 55.0% 63.8% 48.6% 51.8% 52.8% 56.9% 33.2% 2000 56/69 6.3 3.6 53.9% 75.5% 55.3% 64.9% 51.6% 66.2% 41.8%
20 2004 16/16 5.5 3.8 52.6% 68.6% 50.0% 53.5% 40.6% 59.8% 40.5% 2001 72/86 5.5 3.6 53.4% 75.7% 56.2% 60.8% 48.0% 66.5% 44.2%
21 2005 37/37 4.4 2.7 57.3% 69.6% 49.7% 55.1% 41.2% 61.0% 36.0% 2002 62/77 7.2 4.0 51.4% 74.9% 54.3% 59.2% 42.9% 64.7% 43.4%
22 2006 42/43 5.5 2.4 56.7% 70.7% 51.8% 61.6% 39.0% 62.4% 36.5% 2003 39/39 6.5 4.1 51.7% 77.0% 55.0% 62.9% 47.7% 66.2% 44.4%
23 2007 53/53 4.7 2.5 59.8% 71.6% 54.2% 56.1% 43.4% 64.3% 38.2% 2004 80/80 6.3 3.6 54.2% 76.8% 55.1% 64.6% 47.8% 66.9% 42.7%
24 2008 47/48 5.4 2.3 62.8% 72.7% 55.5% 66.4% 41.3% 66.2% 38.6% 2005 43/45 9.2 3.8 56.4% 78.8% 54.0% 62.8% 45.7% 68.1% 41.3%
25 2009 58/60 5.3 1.9 66.0% 70.5% 55.8% 59.4% 42.9% 65.7% 38.4% 2006 46/46 7.3 3.8 55.1% 71.5% 52.6% 51.5% 46.1% 63.0% 43.0%
26 2010 56/58 6.7 2.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 61.6% 41.1% 66.7% 38.6% 2007 48/49 7.6 3.3 53.6% 76.5% 54.8% 59.0% 51.1% 66.2% 40.3%
27 2011 50/50 6.2 2.8 57.6% 72.6% 54.4% 64.6% 42.4% 64.8% 36.1% 2008 27/29 8.2 3.0 54.5% 76.2% 57.4% 57.7% 37.6% 67.8% 42.0%
28 2012 63/64 7.6 2.0 59.8% 74.6% 56.1% 66.1% 49.6% 67.2% 37.0% 2009 52/52 6.5 3.7 53.3% 76.0% 53.3% 62.4% 41.5% 65.5% 41.5%
29 2013 55/58 6.5 1.8 59.3% 74.9% 56.6% 62.6% 45.4% 67.4% 35.5% 2010 29/29 6.3 2.9 56.7% 74.5% 52.0% 56.1% 55.1% 64.6% 42.0%
30 2014 61/61 5.7 1.6 58.5% 73.6% 56.7% 58.8% 49.5% 66.4% 37.9% 2011 17/17 6.6 3.8 56.3% 72.4% 48.7% 54.8% 43.7% 61.8% 37.3%
31 2015 51/52 5.3 1.5 63.6% 72.0% 56.4% 58.6% 44.3% 66.2% 38.7% 2012 24/27 5.8 4.2 52.4% 70.5% 47.8% 57.9% 41.3% 59.7% 37.7%
32 2016 50/53 5.1 2.3 59.4% 73.4% 52.2% 61.9% 37.9% 64.6% 38.5% 2013 40/40 6.2 4.0 51.1% 70.1% 51.9% 59.4% 46.6% 61.1% 39.0%
33 2017 50/52 5.3 2.1 59.6% 77.0% 51.4% 61.0% 43.8% 66.7% 38.0% 2014 34/34 4.9 4.8 53.5% 72.2% 49.7% 59.4% 44.0% 61.3% 39.9%
34 2018 46/46 5.3 1.8 61.9% 70.8% 58.3% 62.4% 43.4% 65.9% 35.2% 2015 12/12 6.8 4.8 54.4% 68.6% 51.2% 55.9% 42.4% 60.7% 37.7%
35 2019 38/38 4.8 1.8 61.6% 70.8% 55.4% 56.4% 36.5% 64.8% 35.9% 2016 2/2 6.0 4.0 54.8% 71.6% 47.1% 70.8% 22.9% 60.4% 38.4%
36 2020 8/9 4.3 1.5 59.5% 67.5% 48.8% 61.0% 48.0% 60.1% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 15/16 5.8 1.6 61.2% 71.2% 55.0% 65.7% 48.2% 64.9% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 4/4 4.3 2.8 66.1% 66.7% 43.8% 62.0% 25.9% 59.2% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 806/824 5.6 2.1 60.3% 72.6% 54.4% 60.9% 43.2% 65.3% 37.3% — 753/811 6.4 3.7 54.1% 74.4% 53.8% 60.2% 46.4% 64.9% 41.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Philipp Kohlschreiber Lleyton Hewitt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1493 104.6 +1.87 +1.38 0.627 41.7% — — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — -0.13
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1615 137.2 -0.46 +2.56 1.025 50.0% +26 — -8 52.9% +0.21 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 103.2 -0.28
18 2002 1494 111.7 +1.75 +1.24 0.831 46.7% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — -0.30 1999 1854 154.0 +2.80 +4.93 1.226 53.8% -9 -254 -123 64.6% +1.10 12–9 (57%) 8–10 (44%) 104.4 -2.41
19 2003 1541 110.3 -0.91 -0.64 0.771 45.0% — -19 — 20.0% -1.90 1–0 0–1 — -0.46 2000 1980 166.2 +3.71 +4.99 1.237 53.9% +30 -228 -146 69.5% +1.24 14–6 (70%) 11–14 (44%) 102.4 -2.06
20 2004 1563 118.6 -1.81 +1.68 1.008 50.2% +51 -66 — 47.4% -0.05 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 96.7 -0.09 2001 2117 162.4 +4.29 +6.67 1.319 54.9% +8 -224 -121 72.0% +1.50 24–9 (73%) 13–9 (59%) 104.9 +1.18
21 2005 1540 123.1 -1.25 -0.93 0.921 48.6% +19 -88 +74 31.3% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 5–10 (33%) 98.9 -0.45 2002 2066 162.1 +3.20 +6.04 1.230 53.8% +19 -160 +114 70.4% +1.26 18–1 (95%) 18–12 (60%) 108.8 -1.87
22 2006 1666 128.8 +0.48 -0.70 0.972 49.3% -24 -88 -28 52.5% -0.06 6–4 (60%) 8–6 (57%) 108.2 -1.11 2003 1940 148.3 +2.77 +6.39 1.313 54.9% +95 -50 +219 66.4% +1.31 8–5 (62%) 8–9 (47%) 92.8 +1.40
23 2007 1770 145.5 +1.76 +1.27 1.071 51.1% -47 -11 -166 57.6% +0.38 6–8 (43%) 16–7 (70%) 104.2 -0.25 2004 2074 161.5 +4.35 +6.35 1.292 54.5% +33 -141 +46 72.4% +1.40 13–6 (68%) 17–7 (71%) 103.8 -2.32
24 2008 1844 153.8 +3.49 +2.48 1.143 52.2% -16 -88 -136 59.1% +0.74 5–7 (42%) 11–12 (48%) 99.3 -0.27 2005 2115 161.5 +4.84 +5.29 1.294 54.3% +42 — +76 69.3% +1.35 12–0 (100%) 14–10 (58%) 107.6 -1.18
25 2009 1835 152.5 +2.28 +2.14 1.118 52.0% -30 +10 -14 55.3% +0.46 13–8 (62%) 10–17 (37%) 98.4 -0.32 2006 1972 142.5 +1.60 +4.43 1.161 52.6% -20 -18 +235 63.1% +0.95 13–5 (72%) 9–8 (53%) 99.4 +0.55
26 2010 1868 156.0 +3.32 +2.10 1.157 52.4% -11 -11 +3 57.9% +0.75 11–9 (55%) 8–10 (44%) 97.9 +0.18 2007 1919 154.1 +2.55 +3.26 1.191 53.1% -12 +96 +217 64.8% +0.95 7–5 (58%) 7–13 (35%) 94.4 +1.23
27 2011 1851 151.1 +1.76 -0.10 1.027 50.5% -4 -7 +92 52.5% 0.00 8–7 (53%) 14–8 (64%) 104.9 -1.50 2008 1937 143.9 +3.50 +4.91 1.303 53.9% -73 +79 +208 61.5% +1.03 2–3 (40%) 4–10 (29%) 92.4 -1.01
28 2012 1893 154.1 +3.39 +0.59 1.127 52.0% -25 -18 +158 58.8% +0.59 15–8 (65%) 22–18 (55%) 105.4 +1.05 2009 1960 156.8 +1.58 +4.92 1.202 53.0% -71 +63 +224 61.0% +0.81 11–9 (55%) 8–12 (40%) 97.5 -1.75
29 2013 1927 162.7 +4.14 -0.29 1.089 51.3% -14 +31 +21 57.0% +0.39 8–6 (57%) 17–12 (59%) 101.7 -0.19 2010 1909 143.7 +1.71 +4.35 1.187 53.0% -77 +73 +318 56.2% +0.49 6–3 (67%) 6–2 (75%) 103.7 -0.34
30 2014 1912 156.3 +2.23 +1.94 1.128 51.7% -11 +29 +33 61.0% +0.76 7–12 (37%) 13–12 (52%) 95.6 +2.10 2011 1819 131.8 -1.17 +0.07 0.976 49.8% -42 — +318 52.3% +0.32 2–4 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 94.5 -0.11
31 2015 1952 161.6 +2.46 +2.49 1.146 52.1% -67 +66 -9 58.0% +0.65 8–12 (40%) 11–14 (44%) 95.9 -1.97 2012 1884 145.7 -2.14 +1.74 0.935 48.9% 0 — +205 50.0% -0.29 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -0.31
32 2016 1882 163.8 +1.22 +2.34 1.088 51.3% -20 +107 +97 55.5% +0.50 10–4 (71%) 7–8 (47%) 102.0 -2.13 2013 1889 147.2 -2.06 +2.77 1.005 50.2% -35 -33 +197 51.8% +0.17 12–8 (60%) 9–7 (56%) 104.4 -1.05
33 2017 1984 158.4 +2.60 +1.78 1.141 52.1% -11 -24 -80 58.6% +0.47 9–6 (60%) 14–10 (58%) 101.8 -1.04 2014 1842 149.1 -2.59 +3.22 1.032 50.5% +15 -61 +258 52.3% +0.10 9–4 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 100.9 -0.31
34 2018 1890 153.2 +1.55 +0.41 1.030 50.3% +33 -4 +11 51.7% +0.07 7–9 (44%) 11–12 (48%) 92.9 -0.03 2015 1715 118.7 -3.34 +0.79 0.958 49.2% +73 — +259 40.5% -0.65 0–7 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 90.2 +0.96
35 2019 1788 154.7 +0.90 +0.51 1.021 50.1% +79 +60 +47 48.4% -0.06 1–7 (13%) 5–6 (45%) 91.8 -1.80 2016 1727 113.5 +0.52 +0.37 0.970 49.3% — — — 50.0% -0.17 — 1–0 — +0.04
36 2020 1730 128.4 -0.63 -1.11 0.811 46.5% +114 +44 — 31.8% -0.86 1–1 0–2 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1716 122.5 +1.57 -1.49 0.971 49.5% +52 +69 +81 45.2% -0.52 0–4 (0%) 5–2 (71%) 96.6 -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 1662 109.8 -0.75 -1.70 0.832 46.1% +93 — — 36.4% -1.64 0–1 1–1 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2047 158.0 +2.01 +1.06 1.072 51.1% -8 +6 +20 54.2% +0.30 120–119 (50%) 181–171 (51%) 98.6 -1.11 — 2160 162.0 +2.20 +4.74 1.192 53.1% +6 -84 +125 63.9% +0.95 174–93 (65%) 153–144 (52%) 100.9 -1.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.