H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Philipp Kohlschreiber vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 4-1

Philipp Kohlschreiber holds a 4–1 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Philipp Kohlschreiber leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Philipp Kohlschreiber won the 2015 US Open second round 7-6(4) 6-2 6-2.

GER Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 3, 2015* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Philipp Kohlschreiber #29 7-6(4) 6-2 6-2 Lukas Rosol #87 Match data
Jul 19, 2014* Hamburg ATP 500 QF Clay Philipp Kohlschreiber #26 6-4 6-4 Lukas Rosol #42 Match data
Jul 11, 2014* Stuttgart ATP 250 R16 Clay Lukas Rosol #48 7-5 7-6(5) Philipp Kohlschreiber #26 Match data
Jul 27, 2012* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 QF Clay Philipp Kohlschreiber #23 6-4 2-6 6-4 Lukas Rosol #97 Match data
Jul 1, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Philipp Kohlschreiber #30 6-2 6-3 7-6(6) Lukas Rosol #100 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Philipp Kohlschreiber #779 #16 2,160 2,054 444 372 54.4% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,921 110 148 42.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Philipp Kohlschreiber Lukas Rosol
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #247 1,493 0 0
19 2003 1–3 25.0% #208 1,541 0 0
20 2004 6–10 37.5% #88 1,562 0 0
21 2005 12–25 32.4% #86 1,538 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0
22 2006 23–20 53.5% #62 1,653 0 0 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,535 0 0
23 2007 30–23 56.6% #32 1,767 0 1 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,562 0 0
24 2008 29–19 60.4% #28 1,857 0 2 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,575 0 0
25 2009 34–26 56.7% #27 1,833 0 2 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,576 0 0
26 2010 34–24 58.6% #34 1,851 0 2 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,748 0 0
27 2011 28–22 56.0% #43 1,848 0 3 2013 21–24 46.7% #47 1,742 0 1
28 2012 40–24 62.5% #20 1,888 0 4 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,798 0 2
29 2013 33–24 57.9% #22 1,937 0 4 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,846 0 2
30 2014 32–25 56.1% #24 1,899 0 4 2016 14–22 38.9% #113 1,726 0 2
31 2015 30–22 57.7% #34 1,972 0 5 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,671 0 2
32 2016 29–22 56.9% #32 1,874 0 6 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,703 0 2
33 2017 32–20 61.5% #29 1,957 0 7 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,660 0 2
34 2018 24–22 52.2% #34 1,886 0 7 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2
35 2019 17–21 44.7% #79 1,787 0 7
36 2020 2–7 22.2% #98 1,725 0 7 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2
37 2021 7–8 46.7% #114 1,717 0 7
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #416 1,662 0 7