H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Philipp Kohlschreiber vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 1-3

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 3–1 lead over Philipp Kohlschreiber in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2009 Beijing fourth round 6-1 6-0.

GER Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 3
4 main draw meetings
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 9, 2009* Beijing ATP 500 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #8 6-1 6-0 Philipp Kohlschreiber #22 Match data
Apr 25, 2008* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #4 3-6 7-5 6-2 Philipp Kohlschreiber #31 Match data
Feb 24, 2007* Rotterdam ATP 500 QF Hard Nikolay Davydenko #3 6-7(6) 6-4 6-4 Philipp Kohlschreiber #58 Match data
Jun 22, 2006* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R32 Grass Philipp Kohlschreiber #96 6-2 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #6 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Philipp Kohlschreiber #779 #16 2,160 2,054 444 372 54.4% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Philipp Kohlschreiber Nikolay Davydenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #247 1,493 0 0
19 2003 1–3 25.0% #208 1,541 0 0 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 2004 6–10 37.5% #88 1,562 0 0 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2005 12–25 32.4% #86 1,538 0 0 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2006 23–20 53.5% #62 1,653 0 0 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2
23 2007 30–23 56.6% #32 1,767 0 1 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4
24 2008 29–19 60.4% #28 1,857 0 2 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5
25 2009 34–26 56.7% #27 1,833 0 2 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10
26 2010 34–24 58.6% #34 1,851 0 2 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11
27 2011 28–22 56.0% #43 1,848 0 3 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14
28 2012 40–24 62.5% #20 1,888 0 4 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19
29 2013 33–24 57.9% #22 1,937 0 4 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20
30 2014 32–25 56.1% #24 1,899 0 4 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21
31 2015 30–22 57.7% #34 1,972 0 5 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21
32 2016 29–22 56.9% #32 1,874 0 6 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21
33 2017 32–20 61.5% #29 1,957 0 7 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21
34 2018 24–22 52.2% #34 1,886 0 7
35 2019 17–21 44.7% #79 1,787 0 7
36 2020 2–7 22.2% #98 1,725 0 7
37 2021 7–8 46.7% #114 1,717 0 7
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #416 1,662 0 7