H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Philipp Kohlschreiber vs Rajeev Ram H2H: 1-0
Philipp Kohlschreiber holds a 1–0 lead over Rajeev Ram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Philipp Kohlschreiber leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Philipp Kohlschreiber won the 2010 San Jose third round 6-7(7) 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 42
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2010* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Philipp Kohlschreiber | 6-7(7) 6-1 6-3 | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philipp Kohlschreiber | #779 | #16 | 2,160 | 2,054 | 444 | 372 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Rajeev Ram | #1,076 | #56 | 826 | 1,747 | 57 | 94 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Philipp Kohlschreiber | Rajeev Ram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #536 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #437 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #297 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 12–25 | 32.4% | #86 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #62 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #32 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #28 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #27 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2010 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #34 | 1,851 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2011 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #43 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #149 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2012 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #132 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2013 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #22 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #127 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2014 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #24 | 1,899 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #139 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2015 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #34 | 1,972 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #89 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2016 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #32 | 1,874 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #129 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2017 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #29 | 1,957 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #353 | 1,582 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2018 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,886 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,787 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2020 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #98 | 1,725 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #114 | 1,717 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #416 | 1,662 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |