H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Philipp Kohlschreiber vs Tomas Zib H2H: 0-1

Tomas Zib holds a 1–0 lead over Philipp Kohlschreiber in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Zib leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Zib won the 2005 San Jose round of 32 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Philipp Kohlschreiber
GER Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Tomas Zib
CZE Age 50 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Zib #87 6-4 6-3 Philipp Kohlschreiber #64 Match data Feb 10, 2005* R32 San Jose ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Philipp Kohlschreiber #779 #16 2,160 2,047 449 375 54.5% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Tomas Zib #1,339 #51 688 1,637 41 94 30.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Philipp Kohlschreiber Tomas Zib
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #247 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 1–3 25.0% #208 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 6–10 37.5% #88 1,563 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2005 12–25 32.4% #86 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2006 23–20 53.5% #62 1,666 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #172 1,487 0 0
23 2007 30–23 56.6% #32 1,770 0 1 1999 4–4 50.0% #111 1,531 0 0
24 2008 29–19 60.4% #28 1,844 0 2 2000 5–13 27.8% #117 1,465 0 0
25 2009 34–26 56.7% #27 1,835 0 2 2001 3–11 21.4% #224 1,438 0 0
26 2010 34–24 58.6% #34 1,867 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2011 28–22 56.0% #43 1,851 0 3 2003 1–5 16.7% #145 1,467 0 0
28 2012 40–24 62.5% #20 1,893 0 4 2004 3–8 27.3% #121 1,482 0 0
29 2013 33–25 56.9% #22 1,927 0 4 2005 18–27 40.0% #59 1,558 0 0
30 2014 36–25 59.0% #24 1,911 0 5 2006 4–20 16.7% #133 1,509 0 0
31 2015 30–22 57.7% #34 1,952 0 6 2007 3–4 42.9% #138 1,535 0 0
32 2016 30–23 56.6% #32 1,882 0 7 2008 0–1 0.0% #416 1,545 0 0
33 2017 32–20 61.5% #29 1,983 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2018 24–22 52.2% #34 1,889 0 8 — — — — — — —
35 2019 17–21 44.7% #79 1,788 0 8 — — — — — — —
36 2020 2–7 22.2% #98 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
37 2021 7–9 43.8% #114 1,716 0 8 — — — — — — —
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #416 1,662 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Philipp Kohlschreiber Tomas Zib
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2002 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 4 5 9 44.4% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 6 10 16 37.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 7 6 13 53.8% 9 9 18 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2007 12 13 25 48.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1999 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
24 2008 22 13 35 62.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2009 19 16 35 54.3% 10 8 18 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2010 21 15 36 58.3% 9 7 16 56.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 16 15 31 51.6% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2012 20 15 35 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2004 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2013 15 14 29 51.7% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2005 8 13 21 38.1% 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2014 17 14 31 54.8% 15 9 24 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2006 1 9 10 10.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2015 11 11 22 50.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2007 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2016 13 13 26 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 17 11 28 60.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 11 11 22 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 8 10 18 44.4% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 224 203 427 52.5% 160 125 285 56.1% 60 41 101 59.4% 5 6 11 45.5% — 20 42 62 32.3% 14 36 50 28.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 806/824 of Philipp Kohlschreiber's and 123/134 of Tomas Zib's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Philipp Kohlschreiber Tomas Zib
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2002 2/2 7.0 3.0 46.3% 67.5% 46.4% 64.4% 40.0% 56.1% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 4/4 3.5 2.3 55.0% 63.8% 48.6% 51.8% 52.8% 56.9% 33.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 16/16 5.5 3.8 52.6% 68.6% 50.0% 53.5% 40.6% 59.8% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 37/37 4.4 2.7 57.3% 69.6% 49.7% 55.1% 41.2% 61.0% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 42/43 5.5 2.4 56.7% 70.7% 51.8% 61.6% 39.0% 62.4% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 53/53 4.7 2.5 59.8% 71.6% 54.2% 56.1% 43.4% 64.3% 38.2% 1999 6/8 5.3 2.3 64.3% 66.8% 49.9% 66.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.5%
24 2008 47/48 5.4 2.3 62.8% 72.7% 55.5% 66.4% 41.3% 66.2% 38.6% 2000 12/18 2.4 1.9 61.0% 63.4% 47.2% 58.4% 41.1% 57.0% 37.4%
25 2009 58/60 5.3 1.9 66.0% 70.5% 55.8% 59.4% 42.9% 65.7% 38.4% 2001 12/14 3.0 1.4 63.1% 65.7% 43.7% 41.2% 47.7% 57.7% 33.8%
26 2010 56/58 6.7 2.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 61.6% 41.1% 66.7% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 50/50 6.2 2.8 57.6% 72.6% 54.4% 64.6% 42.4% 64.8% 36.1% 2003 6/6 2.3 2.0 57.8% 64.6% 50.3% 49.9% 22.2% 58.6% 27.5%
28 2012 63/64 7.6 2.0 59.8% 74.6% 56.1% 66.1% 49.6% 67.2% 37.0% 2004 11/11 3.8 2.1 56.9% 73.1% 55.6% 36.2% 24.5% 65.3% 34.6%
29 2013 55/58 6.5 1.8 59.3% 74.9% 56.6% 62.6% 45.4% 67.4% 35.5% 2005 44/45 3.7 1.9 57.7% 68.3% 50.5% 54.5% 43.5% 60.8% 34.9%
30 2014 61/61 5.7 1.6 58.5% 73.6% 56.7% 58.8% 49.5% 66.4% 37.9% 2006 24/24 4.3 2.1 56.5% 65.2% 48.6% 51.0% 32.7% 57.8% 31.1%
31 2015 51/52 5.3 1.5 63.6% 72.0% 56.4% 58.6% 44.3% 66.2% 38.7% 2007 7/7 3.4 1.7 59.2% 72.8% 47.8% 58.1% 55.7% 62.3% 31.8%
32 2016 50/53 5.1 2.3 59.4% 73.4% 52.2% 61.9% 37.9% 64.6% 38.5% 2008 1/1 12.0 5.0 62.6% 63.6% 51.9% 76.9% 31.6% 59.2% 37.3%
33 2017 50/52 5.3 2.1 59.6% 77.0% 51.4% 61.0% 43.8% 66.7% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 46/46 5.3 1.8 61.9% 70.8% 58.3% 62.4% 43.4% 65.9% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 38/38 4.8 1.8 61.6% 70.8% 55.4% 56.4% 36.5% 64.8% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 8/9 4.3 1.5 59.5% 67.5% 48.8% 61.0% 48.0% 60.1% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 15/16 5.8 1.6 61.2% 71.2% 55.0% 65.7% 48.2% 64.9% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 4/4 4.3 2.8 66.1% 66.7% 43.8% 62.0% 25.9% 59.2% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 806/824 5.6 2.1 60.3% 72.6% 54.4% 60.9% 43.2% 65.3% 37.3% — 123/135 3.7 1.9 58.7% 67.4% 49.4% 52.0% 39.7% 59.9% 34.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Philipp Kohlschreiber Tomas Zib
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2002 1494 111.7 +1.75 +1.24 0.831 46.7% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1541 110.3 -0.91 -0.64 0.771 45.0% — -19 — 20.0% -1.90 1–0 0–1 — -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1563 118.6 -1.81 +1.68 1.008 50.2% +51 -66 — 47.4% -0.05 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 96.7 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 1540 123.1 -1.25 -0.93 0.921 48.6% +19 -88 +74 31.3% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 5–10 (33%) 98.9 -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1666 128.8 +0.48 -0.70 0.972 49.3% -24 -88 -28 52.5% -0.06 6–4 (60%) 8–6 (57%) 108.2 -1.11 1998 1488 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.05
23 2007 1770 145.5 +1.76 +1.27 1.071 51.1% -47 -11 -166 57.6% +0.38 6–8 (43%) 16–7 (70%) 104.2 -0.25 1999 1532 114.4 -0.88 +1.34 1.036 50.8% +42 -22 — 50.0% -0.25 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 99.1 +0.15
24 2008 1844 153.8 +3.49 +2.48 1.143 52.2% -16 -88 -136 59.1% +0.74 5–7 (42%) 11–12 (48%) 99.3 -0.27 2000 1466 109.0 -2.45 -1.12 0.869 47.6% +77 +6 — 30.2% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 99.4 +0.93
25 2009 1835 152.5 +2.28 +2.14 1.118 52.0% -30 +10 -14 55.3% +0.46 13–8 (62%) 10–17 (37%) 98.4 -0.32 2001 1438 104.1 -3.27 -2.71 0.797 46.2% +74 -29 +70 26.7% -1.27 0–2 0–4 (0%) — +0.84
26 2010 1868 156.0 +3.32 +2.10 1.157 52.4% -11 -11 +3 57.9% +0.75 11–9 (55%) 8–10 (44%) 97.9 +0.18 2002 1446 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 1851 151.1 +1.76 -0.10 1.027 50.5% -4 -7 +92 52.5% 0.00 8–7 (53%) 14–8 (64%) 104.9 -1.50 2003 1467 112.3 -1.03 -2.85 0.665 43.6% +18 — — 21.4% -2.14 — 2–1 (67%) — -0.14
28 2012 1893 154.1 +3.39 +0.59 1.127 52.0% -25 -18 +158 58.8% +0.59 15–8 (65%) 22–18 (55%) 105.4 +1.05 2004 1483 116.6 +0.88 -0.84 0.995 48.9% +57 -63 — 37.9% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.3 -0.23
29 2013 1927 162.7 +4.14 -0.29 1.089 51.3% -14 +31 +21 57.0% +0.39 8–6 (57%) 17–12 (59%) 101.7 -0.19 2005 1559 125.5 -1.66 -2.16 0.889 48.0% -7 -52 -39 39.4% -0.58 5–4 (56%) 6–10 (38%) 100.8 +0.40
30 2014 1912 156.3 +2.23 +1.94 1.128 51.7% -11 +29 +33 61.0% +0.76 7–12 (37%) 13–12 (52%) 95.6 +2.10 2006 1510 117.1 -2.65 -3.89 0.738 44.8% -21 -33 +10 23.2% -1.89 0–4 (0%) 2–4 (33%) 93.7 -0.86
31 2015 1952 161.6 +2.46 +2.49 1.146 52.1% -67 +66 -9 58.0% +0.65 8–12 (40%) 11–14 (44%) 95.9 -1.97 2007 1536 109.9 -0.29 -0.67 0.843 47.8% -52 — — 38.9% -0.50 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.21
32 2016 1882 163.8 +1.22 +2.34 1.088 51.3% -20 +107 +97 55.5% +0.50 10–4 (71%) 7–8 (47%) 102.0 -2.13 2008 1546 108.9 -2.23 -0.51 0.914 49.3% — — — 40.0% 0.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.06
33 2017 1984 158.4 +2.60 +1.78 1.141 52.1% -11 -24 -80 58.6% +0.47 9–6 (60%) 14–10 (58%) 101.8 -1.04 2009 1544 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 1890 153.2 +1.55 +0.41 1.030 50.3% +33 -4 +11 51.7% +0.07 7–9 (44%) 11–12 (48%) 92.9 -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 1788 154.7 +0.90 +0.51 1.021 50.1% +79 +60 +47 48.4% -0.06 1–7 (13%) 5–6 (45%) 91.8 -1.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1730 128.4 -0.63 -1.11 0.811 46.5% +114 +44 — 31.8% -0.86 1–1 0–2 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1716 122.5 +1.57 -1.49 0.971 49.5% +52 +69 +81 45.2% -0.52 0–4 (0%) 5–2 (71%) 96.6 -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 1662 109.8 -0.75 -1.70 0.832 46.1% +93 — — 36.4% -1.64 0–1 1–1 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2047 158.0 +2.01 +1.06 1.072 51.1% -8 +6 +20 54.2% +0.30 120–119 (50%) 181–171 (51%) 98.6 -1.11 — 1637 118.7 -1.72 -2.10 0.848 47.2% +15 -33 +1 33.9% -0.98 9–20 (31%) 21–28 (43%) 92.8 +0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.