H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Philipp Kohlschreiber vs Tomas Zib H2H: 0-1
Tomas Zib holds a 1–0 lead over Philipp Kohlschreiber in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Zib leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Zib won the 2005 San Jose third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2005* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Zib | 6-4 6-3 | Philipp Kohlschreiber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philipp Kohlschreiber | #779 | #16 | 2,160 | 2,054 | 444 | 372 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Tomas Zib | #1,339 | #51 | 688 | 1,636 | 41 | 94 | 30.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Philipp Kohlschreiber | Tomas Zib | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 12–25 | 32.4% | #86 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #62 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #32 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #28 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #117 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #27 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #34 | 1,851 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #43 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #121 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #22 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #24 | 1,899 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 4–20 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #34 | 1,972 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2016 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #32 | 1,874 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2017 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #29 | 1,957 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2018 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,886 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,787 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2020 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #98 | 1,725 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #114 | 1,717 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #416 | 1,662 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |