H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Philipp Kohlschreiber vs Tommy Haas H2H: 4-3

Philipp Kohlschreiber holds a 4–3 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on grass, while Philipp Kohlschreiber leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Philipp Kohlschreiber won the 2013 Paris Masters third round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Philipp Kohlschreiber
GER Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 31, 2013* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Philipp Kohlschreiber #23 6-2 6-2 Tommy Haas #12 Match data
Oct 24, 2013* Valencia ATP 250 R32 Hard Philipp Kohlschreiber #24 3-6 6-3 6-3 Tommy Haas #12 Match data
May 5, 2013* Munich ATP 250 F Clay Tommy Haas #14 6-3 7-6(3) Philipp Kohlschreiber #21 Match data
Jun 27, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Philipp Kohlschreiber #30 3-6 7-6(8) 6-7(5) 7-6(1) 6-2 Tommy Haas #50 Match data
Jun 16, 2012* Halle ATP 500 SF Grass Tommy Haas #87 7-6(5) 7-5 Philipp Kohlschreiber #34 Match data
Jun 13, 2009* Halle ATP 500 SF Grass Tommy Haas #41 2-6 7-6(5) 7-6(3) Philipp Kohlschreiber #24 Match data
Jun 13, 2008* Halle ATP 500 R16 Grass Philipp Kohlschreiber #40 7-5 5-7 7-6(5) Tommy Haas #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Philipp Kohlschreiber #779 #16 2,160 2,054 444 372 54.4% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Philipp Kohlschreiber Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #247 1,493 0 0 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 2003 1–3 25.0% #208 1,541 0 0 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 2004 6–10 37.5% #88 1,562 0 0 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 2005 12–25 32.4% #86 1,538 0 0 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 2006 23–20 53.5% #62 1,653 0 0 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 2007 30–23 56.6% #32 1,767 0 1 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 2008 29–19 60.4% #28 1,857 0 2 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 2009 34–26 56.7% #27 1,833 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 2010 34–24 58.6% #34 1,851 0 2 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2011 28–22 56.0% #43 1,848 0 3 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2012 40–24 62.5% #20 1,888 0 4 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 2013 33–24 57.9% #22 1,937 0 4 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 2014 32–25 56.1% #24 1,899 0 4 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 2015 30–22 57.7% #34 1,972 0 5 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 2016 29–22 56.9% #32 1,874 0 6 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 2017 32–20 61.5% #29 1,957 0 7 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 2018 24–22 52.2% #34 1,886 0 7 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 2019 17–21 44.7% #79 1,787 0 7 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 2020 2–7 22.2% #98 1,725 0 7 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 2021 7–8 46.7% #114 1,717 0 7 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #416 1,662 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15