H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Pierre-Hugues Herbert vs Bernard Tomic H2H: 2-1

Pierre-Hugues Herbert holds a 2–1 lead over Bernard Tomic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Pierre-Hugues Herbert leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Bernard Tomic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pierre-Hugues Herbert won the 2017 Vienna Open first round 7-6(4) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pierre-Hugues Herbert
France Age 35 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Bernard Tomic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bernard Tomic #211 6-3 7-5 Pierre-Hugues Herbert #73 Match data Apr 11, 2021* Q1 Q Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Pierre-Hugues Herbert #83 7-6(4) 7-5 Bernard Tomic #145 Match data Oct 26, 2017* R32 Vienna Open ATP 500 Hard
Bernard Tomic #26 7-6(3) 6-4 7-6(5) Pierre-Hugues Herbert #151 Match data Jul 2, 2015* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Pierre-Hugues Herbert #126 6-4 3-6 7-6(7) Bernard Tomic #65 Match data Sep 25, 2014* R32 Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pierre-Hugues Herbert #286 #36 1,168 1,936 105 137 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bernard Tomic #179 #17 1,885 1,972 172 184 48.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pierre-Hugues Herbert Bernard Tomic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #286 1,526 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2010 2–6 25.0% #208 1,591 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2011 14–14 50.0% #42 1,791 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2012 22–26 45.8% #52 1,756 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2013 21–22 48.8% #51 1,786 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 2014 17–16 51.5% #56 1,834 0 2
22 2013 1–2 33.3% #151 1,540 0 0 2015 37–27 57.8% #18 1,914 0 3
23 2014 5–11 31.2% #111 1,707 0 0 2016 28–23 54.9% #26 1,874 0 3
24 2015 7–6 53.8% #167 1,748 0 0 2017 10–20 33.3% #140 1,728 0 3
25 2016 7–12 36.8% #78 1,802 0 0 2018 9–7 56.2% #83 1,745 0 4
26 2017 10–19 34.5% #81 1,749 0 0 2019 7–15 31.8% #185 1,620 0 4
27 2018 24–21 53.3% #55 1,821 0 0 2020 0–1 0.0% #226 1,589 0 4
28 2019 22–24 47.8% #65 1,783 0 0 2021 1–1 50.0% #260 1,608 0 4
29 2020 10–10 50.0% #83 1,791 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2021 9–14 39.1% #110 1,692 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2022 2–3 40.0% #305 1,666 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2023 3–1 75.0% #237 1,653 0 0 2025 1–2 33.3% #192 1,592 0 4
33 2024 1–3 25.0% #148 1,561 0 0 2026 2–1 66.7% #179 1,573 0 4
34 2025 4–7 36.4% #155 1,576 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2026 0–4 0.0% #286 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pierre-Hugues Herbert Bernard Tomic
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 4 4 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2013 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2015 31 17 48 64.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
23 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2016 19 14 33 57.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
24 2015 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2017 3 10 13 23.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
25 2016 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2018 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2017 6 12 18 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2018 18 17 35 51.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2019 9 14 23 39.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2021 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2020 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 7 8 15 46.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
33 2024 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2026 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
34 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 71 89 160 44.4% 19 30 49 38.8% 15 18 33 45.5% — 121 110 231 52.4% 16 43 59 27.1% 35 31 66 53.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 242/242 of Pierre-Hugues Herbert's and 352/356 of Bernard Tomic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Pierre-Hugues Herbert Bernard Tomic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 4/4 4.8 3.3 60.2% 56.3% 47.1% 57.1% 24.5% 52.6% 29.2%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 8/8 3.8 3.0 64.3% 65.2% 45.9% 58.2% 34.1% 58.3% 33.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 28/28 6.5 2.4 65.8% 70.0% 50.1% 63.0% 36.9% 62.9% 34.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 47/48 4.8 1.5 65.8% 67.4% 50.2% 57.5% 36.4% 61.4% 35.1%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 43/43 8.0 1.3 66.4% 71.1% 51.3% 64.6% 38.6% 64.4% 32.7%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 32/33 9.3 1.1 67.2% 73.6% 52.5% 58.0% 40.9% 66.8% 33.0%
22 2013 3/3 6.7 3.3 59.8% 71.0% 49.1% 62.9% 31.1% 62.1% 35.6% 2015 63/64 9.1 1.5 66.1% 73.1% 50.9% 66.3% 40.9% 65.5% 34.2%
23 2014 16/16 11.2 4.0 51.7% 77.3% 54.4% 56.8% 27.9% 65.9% 29.7% 2016 51/51 9.4 2.3 65.3% 72.5% 48.8% 59.9% 36.0% 64.4% 33.1%
24 2015 13/13 12.6 4.5 55.3% 76.7% 52.3% 65.1% 42.0% 65.9% 33.6% 2017 29/30 6.9 1.9 66.7% 69.5% 51.7% 60.9% 35.3% 63.3% 31.1%
25 2016 19/19 10.6 5.1 56.7% 75.7% 51.7% 49.5% 46.9% 65.1% 31.6% 2018 16/16 9.4 1.3 67.3% 73.5% 50.8% 61.3% 43.7% 66.0% 35.6%
26 2017 29/29 9.4 4.2 60.8% 74.0% 49.7% 56.1% 31.9% 64.4% 31.4% 2019 22/22 9.1 1.9 64.6% 68.5% 43.9% 56.2% 36.0% 59.5% 29.6%
27 2018 45/45 8.3 4.0 61.6% 73.9% 51.5% 65.4% 44.3% 65.1% 34.3% 2020 1/1 8.0 2.0 68.8% 64.1% 44.8% 76.5% 16.7% 58.1% 31.6%
28 2019 46/46 6.5 3.2 60.5% 72.7% 51.3% 59.9% 36.4% 64.1% 33.0% 2021 2/2 8.0 4.0 58.8% 68.0% 37.1% 65.6% 28.6% 56.1% 34.6%
29 2020 20/20 7.6 4.1 57.1% 74.4% 46.6% 51.1% 37.1% 62.7% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 23/23 9.1 5.6 56.4% 73.5% 55.6% 62.4% 53.5% 65.4% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 5/5 5.2 3.2 60.0% 74.4% 51.1% 38.1% 33.7% 64.4% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 4/4 11.8 2.3 69.9% 75.3% 46.0% 76.0% 23.4% 66.7% 35.5% 2025 3/3 5.3 2.0 58.0% 69.0% 48.3% 61.0% 37.7% 59.7% 33.3%
33 2024 4/4 12.5 5.0 66.7% 76.2% 40.4% 50.7% 35.7% 64.2% 29.3% 2026 3/3 8.3 2.7 63.0% 71.3% 41.3% 46.3% 38.0% 61.0% 40.3%
34 2025 11/11 8.3 9.1 54.7% 75.6% 44.8% 58.7% 48.4% 61.7% 31.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 4/4 6.8 7.8 64.5% 68.8% 34.0% 40.0% 45.3% 56.5% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 242/242 8.7 4.4 59.0% 74.2% 50.6% 58.6% 39.9% 64.4% 33.4% — 352/356 7.9 1.8 65.8% 70.8% 49.9% 61.2% 37.8% 63.5% 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pierre-Hugues Herbert Bernard Tomic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1502 94.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1526 105.3 -2.94 -0.81 0.615 41.2% -3 — — 30.8% -2.23 — 3–0 (100%) — -0.09
17 2008 1484 95.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1591 118.9 -1.47 -0.26 0.811 46.8% -52 — +98 34.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.20
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1791 144.2 +0.77 -1.38 0.919 48.9% -92 — +124 51.9% -0.18 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) — -0.34
19 2010 1483 100.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1757 150.9 -1.11 -0.69 0.907 48.6% +52 -169 +23 46.3% -0.31 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) — -1.42
20 2011 1457 101.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1787 149.3 +0.99 -2.79 0.919 48.8% -8 -226 +96 50.5% -0.09 7–5 (58%) 16–12 (57%) — -1.00
21 2012 1456 105.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1835 142.5 +1.91 -1.36 0.995 49.7% +21 — +30 53.2% +0.01 7–5 (58%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.73
22 2013 1540 117.0 +2.61 +1.21 0.937 49.2% +27 — — 33.3% -0.33 — 0–1 — -0.17 2015 1915 162.1 +1.61 -0.87 0.990 50.4% +64 -388 -38 57.6% +0.46 12–12 (50%) 18–21 (46%) — +2.35
23 2014 1708 124.4 +0.36 -3.15 0.870 48.0% -10 — -9 33.3% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 5–11 (31%) — +0.74 2016 1875 151.1 +0.69 -2.24 0.928 49.4% +25 -337 +82 57.0% +0.26 9–7 (56%) 12–15 (44%) — +2.21
24 2015 1749 131.2 +1.79 -0.60 0.986 50.2% 0 — — 50.0% +0.15 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.22 2017 1728 133.1 -0.38 -4.25 0.846 47.7% -3 -160 +146 36.6% -0.72 4–3 (57%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.82
25 2016 1803 141.0 +1.37 -2.72 0.908 48.8% -29 -202 +9 44.6% -0.27 0–4 (0%) 7–9 (44%) — -0.69 2018 1745 126.0 +1.66 -1.18 1.046 50.5% -2 — +164 56.8% +0.20 3–4 (43%) 8–2 (80%) — +1.42
26 2017 1749 137.9 -0.18 -2.61 0.881 47.7% +11 -100 -2 38.4% -1.01 3–7 (30%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.71 2019 1621 132.2 -3.23 -3.79 0.733 45.7% +73 -101 +197 34.0% -1.08 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.65
27 2018 1821 144.1 +0.80 -1.62 0.982 50.1% +7 -83 -72 50.8% -0.07 10–9 (53%) 16–16 (50%) — -0.13 2020 1590 103.5 -0.93 -0.44 0.755 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03
28 2019 1783 152.8 +0.32 -1.39 0.919 49.2% -18 +31 +16 45.5% -0.29 6–4 (60%) 9–8 (53%) — -4.04 2021 1608 104.1 -1.59 +0.30 0.788 46.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09
29 2020 1792 141.7 -0.43 +0.98 1.002 50.2% -18 +7 — 52.7% +0.11 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.17 2022 1577 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 1692 141.3 +2.26 -0.73 1.048 51.0% +50 +49 — 46.9% 0.00 2–9 (18%) 5–9 (36%) — -1.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 1666 114.9 -0.42 -1.31 0.969 49.4% +82 — — 45.5% -0.73 0–1 2–0 — +0.03 2024 1563 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 1654 105.4 +0.04 -1.23 1.066 50.4% +78 — — 66.7% +0.67 1–0 1–0 — +0.94 2025 1593 108.5 -0.49 -2.98 0.826 46.7% — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — -0.04
33 2024 1561 110.2 -0.06 -0.94 0.819 47.2% — — — 27.3% -1.09 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.14 2026 1574 107.6 -0.90 +0.99 1.034 51.0% +27 — — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.24
34 2025 1576 114.6 -0.79 -2.33 0.827 47.5% +55 -19 — 36.7% -0.47 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 1545 105.4 -3.13 -0.80 0.810 45.3% — — — 30.8% -1.08 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1936 138.7 +0.53 -1.49 0.940 49.2% +6 -25 -8 45.0% -0.30 35–49 (42%) 61–77 (44%) 91.9 -2.83 — 1973 147.3 +0.35 -1.82 0.915 48.9% +19 -225 +90 49.9% -0.13 59–53 (53%) 98–89 (52%) 105.0 +0.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.