H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Pierre-Hugues Herbert vs Donald Young H2H: 0-1
Donald Young holds a 1–0 lead over Pierre-Hugues Herbert in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Donald Young leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donald Young won the 2016 Winston-Salem second round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 35
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2016* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Donald Young | 6-4 6-1 | Pierre-Hugues Herbert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pierre-Hugues Herbert | #247 | #36 | 1,168 | 1,935 | 105 | 136 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Donald Young | #1,350 | #38 | 1,039 | 1,942 | 125 | 187 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pierre-Hugues Herbert | Donald Young | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #553 | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,380 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #138 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #39 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–23 | 17.9% | #190 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #167 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #57 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #78 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #48 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #81 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #88 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #55 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #61 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #65 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #248 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2020 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #305 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #411 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2023 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #237 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |