H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Pierre-Hugues Herbert vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 1-3

Fernando Verdasco holds a 3–1 lead over Pierre-Hugues Herbert in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Fernando Verdasco leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pierre-Hugues Herbert won the 2019 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pierre-Hugues Herbert
France Age 35 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 25, 2022 Estoril ATP 250 Q2 Q Clay Pierre-Hugues Herbert #157 7-5 6-7(4) 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #118 Match data
Apr 16, 2019* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Pierre-Hugues Herbert #49 6-4 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #38 Match data
Oct 25, 2018* Vienna ATP 500 R32 Hard Fernando Verdasco #30 6-7(6) 6-3 6-4 Pierre-Hugues Herbert #50 Match data
Jun 1, 2017* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Fernando Verdasco #37 6-3 3-6 4-6 6-3 6-3 Pierre-Hugues Herbert #154 Match data
Mar 12, 2017* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fernando Verdasco #29 7-6(5) 6-1 Pierre-Hugues Herbert #74 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pierre-Hugues Herbert #247 #36 1,168 1,935 105 136 43.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pierre-Hugues Herbert Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2013 1–2 33.3% #151 1,541 0 0 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2014 5–11 31.2% #111 1,709 0 0 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2015 7–6 53.8% #167 1,749 0 0 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2016 7–12 36.8% #78 1,801 0 0 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2017 10–19 34.5% #81 1,747 0 0 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2018 24–21 53.3% #55 1,825 0 0 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2019 22–24 47.8% #65 1,783 0 0 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2020 10–10 50.0% #83 1,791 0 0 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2021 9–14 39.1% #110 1,693 0 0 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2022 2–3 40.0% #305 1,667 0 0 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2023 3–1 75.0% #237 1,655 0 0 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 2024 1–3 25.0% #148 1,562 0 0 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 2025 4–7 36.4% #155 1,576 0 0 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 2026 0–3 0.0% #247 1,579 0 0 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7