H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Pierre-Hugues Herbert vs Thomas Fabbiano H2H: 1-0
Pierre-Hugues Herbert holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Fabbiano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pierre-Hugues Herbert leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pierre-Hugues Herbert won the 2019 Marrakech third round 6-7(3) 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 35
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2019* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Pierre-Hugues Herbert | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-1 | Thomas Fabbiano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pierre-Hugues Herbert | #247 | #36 | 1,168 | 1,935 | 105 | 136 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thomas Fabbiano | #1,768 | #70 | 715 | 1,748 | 27 | 62 | 30.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pierre-Hugues Herbert | Thomas Fabbiano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #371 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2014 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #167 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #78 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #81 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #55 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #65 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #73 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2020 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #114 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #305 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2023 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #237 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2024 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2025 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |