H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Potito Starace vs Alberto Martin H2H: 1-2
Alberto Martin holds a 2–1 lead over Potito Starace in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alberto Martin leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Potito Starace won the 2006 Poertschach third round 7-5 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2006* | Poertschach | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Potito Starace | 7-5 7-6(5) | Alberto Martin | Match data |
| May 5, 2005* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Alberto Martin | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Potito Starace | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2005* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Alberto Martin | 6-3 7-5 | Potito Starace | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potito Starace | #943 | #27 | 1,138 | 1,789 | 147 | 188 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alberto Martin | #1,023 | #34 | 1,008 | 1,799 | 218 | 267 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Potito Starace | Alberto Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #226 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #105 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #79 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #76 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2005 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2006 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #54 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2008 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #72 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2009 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #62 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2010 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #47 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #143 | 1,623 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #58 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2012 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #128 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #243 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |