H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Potito Starace vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 3-1
Potito Starace holds a 3–1 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Potito Starace leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2012 Rome Masters second round 6-3 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2012* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Lukasz Kubot | 6-3 5-7 6-2 | Potito Starace | Match data |
| Jan 14, 2011* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Potito Starace | 7-6(5) 2-6 6-3 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
| May 20, 2010* | Nice | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Potito Starace | 6-3 6-4 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
| Apr 10, 2010* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Potito Starace | 6-1 6-0 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potito Starace | #943 | #27 | 1,138 | 1,789 | 147 | 188 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Potito Starace | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #76 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #72 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #62 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #47 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #58 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |