H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Potito Starace vs Marc Gicquel H2H: 0-1

Marc Gicquel holds a 1–0 lead over Potito Starace in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marc Gicquel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marc Gicquel won the 2008 Indian Wells Open first round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Potito Starace
ITA Age 45 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Marc Gicquel
FRA Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marc Gicquel #55 6-4 6-3 Potito Starace #34 Match data Mar 15, 2008* R128 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Potito Starace #943 #27 1,138 1,789 147 189 43.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marc Gicquel #857 #37 1,448 1,787 92 113 44.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Potito Starace Marc Gicquel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 2003 0–1 0.0% #222 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2004 8–9 47.1% #76 1,607 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2005 13–20 39.4% #105 1,589 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2006 13–17 43.3% #83 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2007 25–25 50.0% #31 1,655 0 0 2002 1–1 50.0% #223 1,500 0 0
26 2008 18–22 45.0% #72 1,650 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2009 15–23 39.5% #62 1,667 0 0 2004 1–2 33.3% #170 1,520 0 0
28 2010 23–25 47.9% #47 1,735 0 0 2005 3–2 60.0% #123 1,544 0 0
29 2011 22–26 45.8% #58 1,705 0 0 2006 17–12 58.6% #50 1,750 0 0
30 2012 8–18 30.8% #164 1,599 0 0 2007 21–25 45.7% #70 1,711 0 0
31 2013 1–1 50.0% #152 1,545 0 0 2008 21–24 46.7% #54 1,697 0 0
32 2014 1–2 33.3% #163 1,635 0 0 2009 21–25 45.7% #58 1,717 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2010 5–12 29.4% #151 1,642 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2011 0–3 0.0% #145 1,576 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2012 0–1 0.0% #152 1,591 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2013 0–5 0.0% #120 1,620 0 0
37 — — — — — — — 2014 2–1 66.7% #342 1,639 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Potito Starace Marc Gicquel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 2 6 8 25.0% 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 1 3 4 25.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 1 9 10 10.0% 22 13 35 62.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 2 8 10 20.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 3 9 12 25.0% 11 13 24 45.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 6 11 17 35.3% 17 13 30 56.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2011 5 8 13 38.5% 17 16 33 51.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 9 6 15 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7%
30 2012 1 6 7 14.3% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 5 12 17 29.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
31 2013 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2014 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2009 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 22 62 84 26.2% 120 111 231 51.9% 1 11 12 8.3% 4 5 9 44.4% — 43 59 102 42.2% 26 33 59 44.1% 11 15 26 42.3% 12 6 18 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 335/336 of Potito Starace's and 205/205 of Marc Gicquel's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Potito Starace Marc Gicquel
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 1/1 1.0 4.0 77.0% 52.6% 35.3% 66.7% 60.0% 48.6% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 17/17 3.1 2.0 72.9% 66.4% 47.7% 59.4% 38.3% 61.2% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 33/33 2.5 1.8 73.5% 63.1% 50.7% 62.1% 42.3% 59.9% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 30/30 2.5 1.3 71.4% 64.8% 49.8% 54.5% 49.5% 60.3% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 50/50 1.9 1.6 71.9% 66.3% 54.1% 58.4% 44.6% 62.9% 35.7% 2002 2/2 9.0 1.5 52.9% 72.9% 53.5% 87.5% 50.0% 63.1% 24.8%
26 2008 39/40 2.1 1.3 73.6% 65.5% 53.8% 63.0% 40.5% 62.5% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 38/38 2.8 1.6 73.6% 66.5% 49.4% 54.4% 45.4% 62.1% 35.2% 2004 3/3 2.0 1.7 60.1% 62.3% 54.0% 15.7% 35.2% 59.0% 36.3%
28 2010 48/48 2.7 0.9 73.7% 66.0% 54.2% 58.3% 41.2% 62.7% 37.9% 2005 5/5 4.8 1.8 63.1% 72.8% 48.4% 52.4% 44.6% 64.0% 41.1%
29 2011 48/48 2.6 1.5 71.2% 65.9% 52.2% 61.1% 36.2% 61.7% 35.2% 2006 29/29 6.8 1.6 54.9% 75.8% 50.6% 66.8% 37.8% 64.1% 36.7%
30 2012 26/26 2.7 1.3 70.2% 66.6% 52.9% 55.6% 34.3% 62.1% 33.6% 2007 46/46 6.0 1.9 57.9% 74.2% 50.2% 59.6% 38.2% 63.8% 34.8%
31 2013 2/2 3.5 0.5 76.4% 58.5% 45.2% 67.9% 18.8% 55.1% 27.8% 2008 45/45 6.8 2.2 58.5% 73.2% 49.1% 62.8% 43.5% 63.2% 36.4%
32 2014 3/3 4.3 3.0 71.0% 69.0% 39.4% 63.6% 13.9% 60.6% 32.2% 2009 46/46 5.8 2.8 55.7% 73.1% 51.9% 65.3% 39.3% 63.8% 37.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 17/17 5.4 2.7 54.0% 69.5% 48.9% 50.4% 46.6% 59.4% 34.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 4.3 4.3 53.8% 71.8% 52.6% 40.3% 27.8% 62.6% 28.2%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 1/1 4.0 2.0 61.4% 72.5% 50.0% 42.9% 40.0% 63.9% 42.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 5/5 3.2 3.8 53.0% 61.9% 43.9% 58.1% 39.2% 52.9% 27.8%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 3/3 7.7 1.0 64.8% 77.5% 53.7% 53.6% 41.9% 69.0% 40.0%
Career — 335/336 2.5 1.5 72.5% 65.6% 51.9% 58.8% 41.2% 61.8% 36.0% — 205/205 6.0 2.3 56.8% 73.0% 50.3% 60.8% 40.4% 63.1% 35.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Potito Starace Marc Gicquel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2002 1486 100.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 1482 100.2 -2.12 -0.83 0.751 43.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 1608 122.7 -0.25 -0.36 0.925 49.1% -62 +68 — 52.1% -0.04 3–4 (43%) 6–1 (86%) 104.2 -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 1589 127.8 -1.72 -0.50 0.941 48.9% -80 +98 — 42.5% -0.44 3–6 (33%) 6–6 (50%) 99.7 +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 1591 123.6 -1.06 -0.36 0.937 48.8% -95 +81 — 42.5% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.6 -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 1656 139.1 +0.30 -1.12 0.963 49.6% -227 +192 — 50.0% -0.05 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 101.7 +0.75 2002 1501 101.9 +0.60 -0.57 0.672 47.2% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 0–1 — +0.17
26 2008 1650 140.7 -0.53 -0.42 0.964 49.7% -248 +165 — 49.4% +0.02 4–9 (31%) 9–7 (56%) 96.7 -0.66 2003 1471 94.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 1667 134.6 -0.82 -1.28 0.928 48.6% -226 +112 — 40.7% -0.52 6–8 (43%) 6–10 (38%) 97.6 -0.83 2004 1520 105.8 -1.54 -0.60 0.885 47.3% — — — 33.3% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.55
28 2010 1735 144.1 0.00 +0.48 1.015 50.3% -237 +113 — 45.5% +0.18 8–3 (73%) 5–14 (26%) 101.4 +0.46 2005 1544 107.2 +1.50 +0.12 1.141 52.0% +14 — — 54.5% +0.27 1–0 — — 0.00
29 2011 1705 142.6 -0.69 -2.15 0.919 48.7% -122 +50 — 45.1% -0.19 11–6 (65%) 7–13 (35%) 100.6 +0.53 2006 1750 135.4 +1.93 -0.94 1.024 50.4% -8 -166 — 58.9% +0.30 5–4 (56%) 8–7 (53%) 102.6 +0.08
30 2012 1599 131.9 -0.16 -3.64 0.885 47.8% -68 +88 — 38.6% -0.86 1–7 (13%) 6–6 (50%) 95.2 +0.53 2007 1711 135.5 +0.72 -1.60 0.962 49.2% +21 -89 -185 45.9% -0.15 7–6 (54%) 9–6 (60%) 104.0 -0.22
31 2013 1545 108.7 +1.36 +0.68 0.618 42.8% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 — — -0.11 2008 1697 134.8 +0.16 -0.18 0.988 49.9% -51 -11 +5 45.9% -0.16 4–8 (33%) 10–9 (53%) 96.8 +0.69
32 2014 1636 117.8 -1.10 -2.35 0.819 46.8% — +36 — 25.0% -1.25 1–0 0–1 — +0.17 2009 1718 138.5 +0.34 +0.15 1.022 50.3% -16 -6 -26 49.1% -0.07 4–8 (33%) 6–7 (46%) 96.3 +0.21
33 2015 1623 104.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1643 123.6 -2.04 -2.07 0.852 47.8% +67 -11 -42 35.0% -0.90 0–2 4–3 (57%) — -0.86
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1576 104.0 -0.75 -0.94 0.755 45.2% — — — 10.0% -1.70 — 0–1 — +0.29
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1592 108.8 +2.93 -4.09 1.168 52.6% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — -0.07
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1621 111.9 -3.55 -2.25 0.591 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.08 — 0–2 — +0.06
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1640 117.0 +2.04 +0.21 1.292 53.2% +39 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.13
Career — 1790 139.7 -0.51 -1.00 0.943 49.1% -173 +113 — 45.0% -0.25 50–56 (47%) 60–68 (47%) 100.3 +0.35 — 1787 131.8 +0.34 -0.77 0.970 49.5% -4 -57 -51 46.1% -0.22 22–30 (42%) 40–38 (51%) 99.1 +0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.