H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Potito Starace vs Marc Gicquel H2H: 0-1
Marc Gicquel holds a 1–0 lead over Potito Starace in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marc Gicquel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marc Gicquel won the 2008 Indian Wells Masters first round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2008* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Marc Gicquel | 6-4 6-3 | Potito Starace | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potito Starace | #943 | #27 | 1,138 | 1,789 | 147 | 188 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marc Gicquel | #857 | #37 | 1,448 | 1,785 | 92 | 113 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Potito Starace | Marc Gicquel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #76 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #72 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #62 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #47 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #123 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #58 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #70 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #54 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #58 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #151 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |