H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Potito Starace vs Maximo Gonzalez H2H: 1-0
Potito Starace holds a 1–0 lead over Maximo Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Potito Starace leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Potito Starace won the 2009 Hamburg second round 5-7 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2009* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Potito Starace | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | Maximo Gonzalez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potito Starace | #943 | #27 | 1,138 | 1,789 | 147 | 188 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maximo Gonzalez | #467 | #58 | 992 | 1,702 | 28 | 60 | 31.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Potito Starace | Maximo Gonzalez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #76 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #121 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #132 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #66 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #72 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #141 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #62 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #47 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #347 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #58 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #157 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #150 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #392 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |